Literature DB >> 18499604

Dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: the effect on recovery outcome variables.

Burcu Tufanogullari1, Paul F White, Mariana P Peixoto, Daniel Kianpour, Thomas Lacour, James Griffin, Gary Skrivanek, Amy Macaluso, Mary Shah, David A Provost.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (Dex), an alpha(2) agonist, has well-known anesthetic and analgesic-sparing effects. We designed this prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled dose-ranging study to evaluate the effect of Dex on both early and late recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
METHODS: Eighty consenting ASA II-III morbidly obese patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: (1) control group received a saline infusion during surgery, (2) Dex 0.2 group received an infusion of 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) IV, (3) Dex 0.4 group received an infusion of 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) IV, and (4) Dex 0.8 group received an infusion of 0.8 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) IV. Mean arterial blood pressure values were maintained within +/-25% of the preinduction baseline values by varying the inspired desflurane concentration. Perioperative hemodynamic variables, postoperative pain scores, and the need for "rescue" analgesics and antiemetics were recorded at specific intervals. Follow-up evaluations were performed on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 7 to assess severity of pain, analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction with pain management, quality of recovery, as well as resumption of dietary intake and recovery of bowel function.
RESULTS: Dex infusion, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1), reduced the average end-tidal desflurane concentration by 19, 20, and 22%, respectively. However, it failed to facilitate a significantly faster emergence from anesthesia. Although the intraoperative hemodynamic values were similar in the four groups, arterial blood pressure values were significantly reduced in the Dex 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 groups compared with the control group on admission to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (P < 0.05). The length of the PACU stay was significantly reduced in the Dex groups (81 +/- 31 to 87 +/- 24 vs 104 +/- 33 min in the control group, P < 0.05). The amount of rescue fentanyl administered in the PACU was significantly less in the Dex 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 groups versus control group (113 +/- 85, 108 +/- 67, and 120 +/- 78 vs 187 +/- 99 microg, respectively, P < 0.05). The percentage of patients requiring antiemetic therapy was also reduced in the Dex groups (30, 30, and 10% vs 70% in the control group). However, the patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirements on PODs 1 and 2 were not different among the four groups. Pain scores in the PACU, and on PODs 1, 2, and 7, in the three Dex groups were not different from the control group. Finally, quality of recovery scores and times to recovery of bowel function and hospital discharge did not differ among the four groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of an intraoperative Dex infusion (0.2-0.8 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) decreased fentanyl use, antiemetic therapy, and the length of stay in the PACU. However, it failed to facilitate late recovery (e.g., bowel function) or improve the patients' overall quality of recovery. When used during bariatric surgery, a Dex infusion rate of 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) is recommended to minimize the risk of adverse cardiovascular side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18499604     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318172c47c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  91 in total

Review 1.  Dexmedetomidine: a review of its use for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care setting and for procedural sedation.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Advancing frontiers in anaesthesiology with laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jayashree Sood
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Canadian consensus statement: enhanced recovery after surgery in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Jerry T Dang; Vivian G Szeto; Ahmad Elnahas; James Ellsmere; Allan Okrainec; Amy Neville; Samaad Malik; Ekua Yorke; Dennis Hong; Laurent Biertho; Timothy Jackson; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols.

Authors:  J Creswell Simpson; Xiaodong Bao; Aalok Agarwala
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic gastric-bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled double-blinded trial.

Authors:  Eric Albrecht; Kyle R Kirkham; Ryan V W Endersby; Vincent W S Chan; Timothy Jackson; Allan Okrainec; Todd Penner; Rongyu Jin; Richard Brull
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Analgesic treatment in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Lars P H Andersen; Mads U Werner; Jacob Rosenberg; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Magnesium Sulfate Reduced Opioid Consumption in Obese Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nurcan Kizilcik; Ozge Koner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Postoperative analgesia in morbid obesity.

Authors:  Adrian Alvarez; Preet Mohinder Singh; Ashish C Sinha
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Anesthetic Pharmacology and the Morbidly Obese Patient.

Authors:  Jerry Ingrande; Hendrikus Jm Lemmens
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2012-12-13

10.  Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  R Polat; K Peker; I Baran; G Bumin Aydın; Ç Topçu Gülöksüz; A Dönmez
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.