Literature DB >> 18499547

Effect of vascular augmentation on the haemodynamics and survival area in a rat abdominal perforator flap model.

Yusuke Yamamoto1, Hiroyuki Sakurai, Hiroaki Nakazawa, Motohiro Nozaki.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: A major drawback of the DIEP flap is the compromised venous drainage in the distal area, which is the rationale behind the creation of additional venous anastomoses for better flap survival. Although venous congestion is defined as an increase in the venous pressure, the effect of vascular augmentation on the venous pressure has not been elucidated. We investigated the effects of arterial supercharge and venous superdrainage on the venous pressure and the flap survival area in a rat abdominal perforator flap model. An abdominal perforator flap was raised in each of 30 Wistar rats, with the contralateral superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and vein (SIEV) isolated for pressure measurements. The changes in the SIEV pressure were recorded while proximal sites of these vessels were opened and closed. Thereafter, the animals were divided into three groups: a control group (n=10, both the SIEA and SIEV were ligated), an enhanced arterial inflow (EAI) group (n=10, the SIEA was left intact) and a supplemental venous outflow (SVO) group (n=10, the SIEV was left intact). The flap survival area was determined 7 days after surgery. The SIEV pressure without vascular augmentation was only 13.2+/-5.9 mm Hg. Compared with the control group, the flap survival area was significantly larger in the EAI group, but not in the SVO group. An extremely high venous pressure was noted when the SIEA was opened and the SIEV was occluded, but there was great variation among the individual animals (range: 21.2-79.6 mm Hg). The necrotic area in the EAI group correlated well with the SIEV pressure (r=0.861). These findings indicate that the major factor contributing to distal necrosis in this rat perforator flap model is arterial insufficiency rather than venous congestion. The results suggest that, as long as the arterial inflow is secure, the venous pressure is a reliable parameter for deciding the necessity of venous superdrainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18499547     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Development of a long-term ovine model of cutaneous burn and smoke inhalation injury and the effects of early excision and skin autografting.

Authors:  Yusuke Yamamoto; Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Sebastian Rehberg; Sven Asmussen; Hiroshi Ito; Linda E Sousse; Robert A Cox; Donald J Deyo; Lillian D Traber; Maret G Traber; David N Herndon; Daniel L Traber
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 2.  Management of postoperative microvascular compromise and ischemia reperfusion injury in breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer: Retrospective review of 2103 flaps.

Authors:  Michelle Coriddi; Paige Myers; Babak Mehrara; Jonas Nelson; Peter G Cordeiro; Joseph Disa; Evan Matros; Joseph Dayan; Robert Allen; Colleen McCarthy
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.425

3.  The effects of optimizing blood inflow in the pedicle on perforator flap survival: A pilot study in a rat model.

Authors:  Radu Olariu; Helen Laura Moser; Ioana Lese; Dan Sabau; Alexandru Valentin Georgescu; Adriaan Ockert Grobbelaar; Mihai Adrian Constantinescu
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05-15

4.  What's the remedy for the distal necrosis of DIEP flap, better venous drain or more arterial supply?

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Tingliang Wang; Jiao Wei; Jinguang He; Tao Wang; Ying Liu; Hua Xu; Jiasheng Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Venous Drainage Position on Arterial Blood Supply and Venous Return within the Conjoined Flap.

Authors:  Shanshan Xi; Sheng Cheng; Junsheng Lou; Lingfeng Qiu; Qingwen Yang; Wanping Yu; Jin Mei; Maolin Tang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.