Literature DB >> 18498937

Neuro-economics in chicks: foraging choices based on amount, delay and cost.

Toshiya Matsushima1, Ai Kawamori, Tiaza Bem-Sojka.   

Abstract

Studies on the foraging choices are reviewed, with an emphasis on the neural representations of elementary factors of food (i.e., amount, delay and consumption time) in the avian brain. Domestic chicks serve as an ideal animal model in this respect, as they quickly associate cue colors with subsequently supplied food rewards, and their choices are quantitatively linked with the rewards. When a pair of such color cues was simultaneously presented, the trained chicks reliably made choices according to the profitability of food associated with each color. Two forebrain regions are involved in distinct aspects of choices; i.e., nucleus accumbens-medial striatum (Ac-MSt) and arcopallium intermedium (AI), an association area in the lateral forebrain. Localized lesions of Ac-MSt enhanced delay aversion, and the ablated chicks made impulsive choices of immediate reward more frequently than sham controls. On the other hand, lesions of AI enhanced consumption-time aversion, and the ablated chicks shifted their choices toward easily consumable reward with their impulsiveness unchanged; delay and consumption time are thus doubly dissociated. Furthermore, chicks showed distinct patterns of risk-sensitive choices depending on the factor that varied at trials. Risk aversion occurred when food amount varied, whereas consistent risk sensitivity was not found when the delay varied; amount and delay were not interchangeable. Choices are thus deviated from those predicted as optima. Instead, factors such as amount, delay and consumption time could be separately represented and processed to yield economically sub-optimal choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18498937     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  5 in total

Review 1.  Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Caroline M Coppens; Sietse F de Boer; Jaap M Koolhaas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Social influences of competition on impulsive choices in domestic chicks.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Amita; Ai Kawamori; Toshiya Matsushima
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Risk-sensitivity in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Arne J Nagengast; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Social facilitation revisited: increase in foraging efforts and synchronization of running in domestic chicks.

Authors:  Yukiko Ogura; Toshiya Matsushima
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Better, Not Just More-Contrast in Qualitative Aspects of Reward Facilitates Impulse Control in Pigs.

Authors:  Manuela Zebunke; Maren Kreiser; Nina Melzer; Jan Langbein; Birger Puppe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.