Literature DB >> 18498784

Predictors of prolonged length of stay after lobectomy for lung cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk-adjustment model.

Cameron D Wright1, Henning A Gaissert, Joshua D Grab, Sean M O'Brien, Eric D Peterson, Mark S Allen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few reliable estimations of operative risk exist for lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy. This study identified risk factors associated with prolonged length of hospital stay (PLOS) after lobectomy for lung cancer as a surrogate for perioperative morbid events.
METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Surgery Database was queried for patients with lobectomy for lung cancer. A model of preoperative risk factors was developed by multivariate stepwise logistic regression setting the threshold for PLOS at 14 days. Morbidity was measured as postoperative events as defined in the STS database. Risk-adjusted results were reported to participating sites.
RESULTS: From January 2002 to June 2006, 4979 lobectomies were performed for lung cancer at 56 STS sites, and 351 (7%) had a PLOS. They had more postoperative events than patients without PLOS (3.4 vs 1.2; p < 0.0001). Patients with PLOS also had higher mortality than those with normal LOS, at 10.8% (38 of 351) vs 0.7% (33 of 4628; p < 0.0001). Significant predictors of PLOS included age per 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.30, p < 0.001), Zubrod score (OR, 1.51; p < 0.001), male sex (OR, 1.45; p = 0.002), American Society of Anesthesiology score (OR, 1.54; p < 0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes (OR. 1.71; p = 0.037), renal dysfunction (OR, 1.79; p = 0.004), induction therapy (OR, 1.65; p = 0.001), percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second in 10% increments (OR, 0.88; p < 0.001), and smoking (OR, 1.33; p = 0.095). After risk adjustment, twofold interhospital variability existed in PLOS among STS sites
CONCLUSIONS: We identified significant predictors of PLOS, a surrogate morbidity marker after lobectomy for lung cancer. This model may be used to provide meaningful risk-adjusted outcome comparisons to STS sites for quality improvement purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18498784     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  50 in total

1.  Risk quantification for pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yasuo Sekine; Hidemi Suzuki; Takahiro Nakajima; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Shigetoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

3.  Adverse effects of smoking on postoperative outcomes in cancer patients.

Authors:  Csaba Gajdos; Mary T Hawn; Elizabeth J Campagna; William G Henderson; Jasvinder A Singh; Thomas Houston
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Pulmonary function tests do not predict pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Mark F Berry; Nestor R Villamizar-Ortiz; Betty C Tong; William R Burfeind; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Worse Prognosis for Stage IA Lung Cancer Patients with Smoking History and More Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Yukihiro Yoshida; Hidenori Kage; Tomohiro Murakawa; Yasunori Sato; Satoshi Ota; Masashi Fukayama; Jun Nakajima
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 6.  Beyond borders-international database collaboration in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  John Agzarian; Yaron Shargall
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Moving beyond disease-focused decision making: understanding competing risks to personalize lung cancer treatment for older adults.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; James D Maloney
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment: A Novel Tool for Preoperative Evaluation of the Geriatric Oncology Patient.

Authors:  Armin Shahrokni; Amy Tin; Robert J Downey; Vivian Strong; Sanam Mahmoudzadeh; Manpreet K Boparai; Sincere McMillan; Andrew Vickers; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Does surgeon experience affect outcomes in pathologic stage I lung cancer?

Authors:  Paul J Scheel; Traves D Crabtree; Jennifer M Bell; Christine Frederiksen; Stephen R Broderick; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Gender-specific differences in care-seeking behaviour among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rezwanul Hasan Rana; Fariha Alam; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Gow
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.