Literature DB >> 18498581

Surface modifications of dental implants.

C M Stanford1.   

Abstract

Dental implant surface technologies have been evolving rapidly to enhance a more rapid bone formation on their surface and hold a potential to increase the predictability of expedited implant therapy. While implant outcomes have become highly predictable, there are sites and conditions that result in elevated implant loss. This paper reviews the impact of macro-retentive features which includes approaches to surface oxide modification, thread design, press-fit and sintered-bead technologies to increase predictability of outcomes. Implant designs that lead to controlled lateral compression of the bone can improve primary stability as long as the stress does not exceed the localized yield strength of the cortical bone. Some implant designs have reduced crestal bone loss by use of multiple cutting threads that are closely spaced, smoothed on the tip but designed to create a hoop-stress stability of the implant as it is completely seated in the osteotomy. Following the placement of the implant, there is a predictable sequence of bone turnover and replacement at the interface that allows the newly formed bone to adapt to microscopic roughness on the implant surface, and on some surfaces, a nanotopography (<10(-9) m scale) that has been shown to preferably influence the formation of bone. Newly emerging studies show that bone cells are exquisitely sensitive to these topographical features and will upregulate the expression of bone related genes for new bone formation when grown on these surfaces. We live in an exciting time of rapid changes in the modalities we can offer patients for tooth replacement therapy. Given this, it is our responsibility to be critical when claims are made, incorporate into our practice what is proven and worthwhile, and to continue to support and provide the best patient care possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18498581     DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00038.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  15 in total

1.  Effects on cytotoxicity and antibacterial properties of the incorporations of silver nanoparticles into the surface coating of dental alloys.

Authors:  Xiao-Ting Shen; Yan-Zhen Zhang; Fang Xiao; Jing Zhu; Xiao-Dong Zheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Computer-assisted flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia.

Authors:  Volkan Arısan; Nilüfer Bölükbaşı; Lütfiye Öksüz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Assessment of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment for Implant Osseointegration.

Authors:  Natalie R Danna; Bryan G Beutel; Nick Tovar; Lukasz Witek; Charles Marin; Estevam A Bonfante; Rodrigo Granato; Marcelo Suzuki; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Cell adhesion and in vivo osseointegration of sandblasted/acid etched/anodized dental implants.

Authors:  Mu-Hyon Kim; Kyeongsoon Park; Kyung-Hee Choi; Soo-Hong Kim; Se Eun Kim; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Current trends in dental implants.

Authors:  Laura Gaviria; John Paul Salcido; Teja Guda; Joo L Ong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

6.  A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps.

Authors:  Michel Dard; Makoto Shiota; Minoru Sanda; Yasutomo Yajima; Hideshi Sekine; Shohei Kasugai
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-04-04

7.  Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model.

Authors:  Maria Ángeles Pérez-Albacete Martínez; Carlos Pérez-Albacete Martínez; José Eduardo Maté Sánchez De Val; María Luisa Ramos Oltra; Manuel Fernández Domínguez; Jose Luis Calvo Guirado
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorfometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs.

Authors:  Manuel M Romero-Ruiz; Francisco Javier Gil-Mur; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Pedro Lázaro-Calvo; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Antimicrobial surfaces for craniofacial implants: state of the art.

Authors:  Lisa Actis; Laura Gaviria; Teja Guda; Joo L Ong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-04-23

10.  New bone formation and trabecular bone microarchitecture of highly porous tantalum compared to titanium implant threads: A pilot canine study.

Authors:  Jin Whan Lee; Hai Bo Wen; Prabhu Gubbi; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.