Literature DB >> 18497157

Sustained removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater following stimulation of dissimilatory metal reduction.

A Lucie N'Guessan1, Helen A Vrionis, Charles T Resch, Philip E Long, Derek R Lovley.   

Abstract

Previous field studies on in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater in an aquifer in Rifle, Colorado identified two distinct phases following the addition of acetate to stimulate microbial respiration. In phase I, Geobacter species are the predominant organisms, Fe(III) is reduced, and microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) removes uranium from the groundwater. In phase II, Fe(III) is depleted, sulfate is reduced, and sulfate-reducing bacteria predominate. Long-term monitoring revealed an unexpected third phase during which U(VI) removal continues even after acetate additions are stopped. All three of these phases were successfully reproduced in flow-through sediment columns. When sediments from the third phase were heat sterilized, the capacity for U(VI) removal was lost. In the live sediments U(VI) removed from the groundwater was recovered as U(VI) in the sediments. This contrasts to the recovery of U(IV) in sediments resulting from the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) during the Fe(III) reduction phase in acetate-amended sediments. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences in the sediments in which U(VI) was being adsorbed indicated that members of the Firmicutes were the predominant organisms whereas no Firmicutes sequences were detected in background sediments which did not have the capacity to sorb U(VI), suggesting that the U(VI) adsorption might be due to the presence of these living organisms or at least their intact cell components. This unexpected enhanced adsorption of U(VI) onto sediments following the stimulation of microbial growth in the subsurface may potentially enhance the cost effectiveness of in situ uranium bioremediation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18497157     DOI: 10.1021/es071960p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  18 in total

1.  Laboratory evolution of Geobacter sulfurreducens for enhanced growth on lactate via a single-base-pair substitution in a transcriptional regulator.

Authors:  Zarath M Summers; Toshiyuki Ueki; Wael Ismail; Shelley A Haveman; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Microbial functional gene diversity with a shift of subsurface redox conditions during In Situ uranium reduction.

Authors:  Yuting Liang; Joy D Van Nostrand; Lucie A N'guessan; Aaron D Peacock; Ye Deng; Philip E Long; C Tom Resch; Liyou Wu; Zhili He; Guanghe Li; Terry C Hazen; Derek R Lovley; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  In situ to in silico and back: elucidating the physiology and ecology of Geobacter spp. using genome-scale modelling.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Dynamics of microbial community composition and function during in situ bioremediation of a uranium-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  Joy D Van Nostrand; Liyou Wu; Wei-Min Wu; Zhijian Huang; Terry J Gentry; Ye Deng; Jack Carley; Sue Carroll; Zhili He; Baohua Gu; Jian Luo; Craig S Criddle; David B Watson; Philip M Jardine; Terence L Marsh; James M Tiedje; Terry C Hazen; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Adsorption of cesium ion by marine actinobacterium Nocardiopsis sp. 13H and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) role in bioremediation.

Authors:  Pitchiah Sivaperumal; Kannan Kamala; Rajendran Rajaram
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  The genome of the Gram-positive metal- and sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfotomaculum reducens strain MI-1.

Authors:  Pilar Junier; Thomas Junier; Sheila Podell; David R Sims; John C Detter; Athanasios Lykidis; Cliff S Han; Nicholas S Wigginton; Terry Gaasterland; Rizlan Bernier-Latmani
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Enrichment of specific protozoan populations during in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater.

Authors:  Dawn E Holmes; Ludovic Giloteaux; Kenneth H Williams; Kelly C Wrighton; Michael J Wilkins; Courtney A Thompson; Thomas J Roper; Philip E Long; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Fe(III) reduction and U(VI) immobilization by Paenibacillus sp. strain 300A, isolated from Hanford 300A subsurface sediments.

Authors:  Bulbul Ahmed; Bin Cao; Jeffrey S McLean; Tuba Ica; Alice Dohnalkova; Ozlem Istanbullu; Akin Paksoy; Jim K Fredrickson; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genes required for alleviation of uranium toxicity in sulfate reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio alaskensis G20 [corrected].

Authors:  Xiangkai Li; He Zhang; Yantian Ma; Pu Liu; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  A new uranium bioremediation approach using radio-tolerant Deinococcus radiodurans biofilm.

Authors:  T Manobala; Sudhir K Shukla; T Subba Rao; M Dharmendira Kumar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.