Literature DB >> 18496994

Differences in rust in hearing aid batteries across four manufacturers, four battery sizes, and five durations of exposure.

Michael Valente1, Jamie H Cadieux, Laura Flowers, John G Newman, Juergen Scherer, Greg Gephart.   

Abstract

Three hundred twenty zinc-air batteries representing four manufacturers (Energizer, Power One, Duracell, and Ray-O-Vac) and four cell sizes (10, 312, 13, and 675) were exposed in a salt spray fog apparatus for 2.5, 5.5, 24, 48, and 72 hours. At the conclusion of each exposure, the batteries were rated blindly for the presence of rust by four experienced audiologists using a four point rating scale. Results revealed significant differences in the rating of rust across the four manufacturers and duration of exposure. No statistically significant difference was found across cell size. Also, the correlation between raters was exceptionally high indicating that each audiologist rated the presence of rust for each battery in a very similar manner. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) techniques were applied and provided answers for the observed differences in rust between the four manufacturers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18496994     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18.10.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  1 in total

1.  Performance analysis of ten brands of batteries for hearing aids.

Authors:  Silvio Pires Penteado; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.