PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of cognitive training (CT) and cognitive stimulation (CS) programs for the community elderly with subjective memory complaints (SMC). METHOD: The single-blind non-randomized controlled study was applied. The numbers of CT and CS participants were 14 and 11. The mean ages of CT and CS participants were 68.71 and 70.36. Memory training and problem solving strategies were applied in the CT group. There were ten 2-hourly sessions of CT, held twice weekly. CS group met once weekly in a 1.5-h class for eight classes. Cognitive performance tests of general cognitive performance, verbal memory and executive function were measured before/after the training and at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: In both training conditions, the general cognitive performance were enhanced. The CT group showed improvement in the verbal memory test. The CS group did not trigger any training effect in the verbal memory test but the executive function. All cognitive progresses remained at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both cognitive training and cognitive stimulation programs showed training effects and remained until 6 months. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of cognitive training (CT) and cognitive stimulation (CS) programs for the community elderly with subjective memory complaints (SMC). METHOD: The single-blind non-randomized controlled study was applied. The numbers of CT and CSparticipants were 14 and 11. The mean ages of CT and CSparticipants were 68.71 and 70.36. Memory training and problem solving strategies were applied in the CT group. There were ten 2-hourly sessions of CT, held twice weekly. CS group met once weekly in a 1.5-h class for eight classes. Cognitive performance tests of general cognitive performance, verbal memory and executive function were measured before/after the training and at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: In both training conditions, the general cognitive performance were enhanced. The CT group showed improvement in the verbal memory test. The CS group did not trigger any training effect in the verbal memory test but the executive function. All cognitive progresses remained at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both cognitive training and cognitive stimulation programs showed training effects and remained until 6 months. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Colette M Smart; Justin E Karr; Corson N Areshenkoff; Laura A Rabin; Carol Hudon; Nicola Gates; Jordan I Ali; Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo; Rachel F Buckley; Gael Chetelat; Harald Hampel; Frank Jessen; Natalie L Marchant; Sietske A M Sikkes; Andrea Tales; Wiesje M van der Flier; Linda Wesselman Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Clifford S Calley; Gail D Tillman; Kyle Womack; Patricia Moore; John Hart; Michael A Kraut Journal: Cogn Behav Neurol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Agnes S Chan; Winnie K Cheung; Michael K Yeung; Jean Woo; Timothy Kwok; David H K Shum; Ruby Yu; Mei-Chun Cheung Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 5.750