OBJECTIVE: Both physicians and nurses play important roles in discussing do not resuscitate (DNR) orders with patients and surrogates. However, the beliefs and attitudes of health professionals about the role nurses should play in this process have received little systematic study. DESIGN AND SETTING: An anonymous survey was conducted of 217 attending internists, 132 medical house officers, and 219 staff nurses working on the medical floors and units at two teaching hospitals about their beliefs, attitudes, and confidence regarding DNR discussions. RESULTS: Attendings and house officers were more likely than nurses to believe that nurses should never initiate DNR discussions (p < .001). Nonetheless, 69% of both physician groups agreed that nurses should be allowed to do so. Nurses were the most likely of the three groups to consider DNR discussions rewarding clinical experiences (p < .001). In a multivariate ordinal regression model controlling for sex, attitudes about DNR discussions, and confidence in discussing consent for medical procedures, nurses were less confident than attendings (p = .04) but more confident than house officers in their ability to discuss DNR orders (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Staff nurses were more likely than their physician colleagues to believe they should be allowed to initiate DNR discussions, were more confident in their ability to discuss DNR than house officers, and had more positive attitudes. These results suggest further exploration of the role nurses should play in the DNR process.
OBJECTIVE: Both physicians and nurses play important roles in discussing do not resuscitate (DNR) orders with patients and surrogates. However, the beliefs and attitudes of health professionals about the role nurses should play in this process have received little systematic study. DESIGN AND SETTING: An anonymous survey was conducted of 217 attending internists, 132 medical house officers, and 219 staff nurses working on the medical floors and units at two teaching hospitals about their beliefs, attitudes, and confidence regarding DNR discussions. RESULTS: Attendings and house officers were more likely than nurses to believe that nurses should never initiate DNR discussions (p < .001). Nonetheless, 69% of both physician groups agreed that nurses should be allowed to do so. Nurses were the most likely of the three groups to consider DNR discussions rewarding clinical experiences (p < .001). In a multivariate ordinal regression model controlling for sex, attitudes about DNR discussions, and confidence in discussing consent for medical procedures, nurses were less confident than attendings (p = .04) but more confident than house officers in their ability to discuss DNR orders (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Staff nurses were more likely than their physician colleagues to believe they should be allowed to initiate DNR discussions, were more confident in their ability to discuss DNR than house officers, and had more positive attitudes. These results suggest further exploration of the role nurses should play in the DNR process.
Authors: Judith E Nelson; Therese B Cortez; J Randall Curtis; Dana R Lustbader; Anne C Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Margaret L Campbell; David E Weissman; Kathleen A Puntillo Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.918
Authors: Ramona L Rhodes; Kate Tindall; Lei Xuan; M Elizabeth Paulk; Ethan A Halm Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Nina S Krimshtein; Carol A Luhrs; Kathleen A Puntillo; Therese B Cortez; Elayne E Livote; Joan D Penrod; Judith E Nelson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Hsiao-Ting Chang; Ming-Hwai Lin; Chun-Ku Chen; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shinn-Jang Hwang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Li-Fen Wu; Li-Fang Chang; Yu-Chun Hung; Chin Lin; Shiow-Jyu Tzou; Lin-Ju Chou; Hsueh-Hsing Pan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 3.390