OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of norepinephrine and levosimendan on microvascular perfusion and oxygenation in a rat model of septic shock. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Forty Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Sepsis was induced in 32 animals by cecal ligation and puncture. Eight animals served as sham controls. Animals were randomly assigned to five groups: 1) fluid resuscitation (25 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1)), 2) fluid resuscitation plus norepinephrine (0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), 3) fluid resuscitation plus levosimendan (0.3 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), 4) no treatment and 5) sham control. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Microvascular perfusion was quantitated using sidestream darkfield imaging and microvascular oxygenation (microPO2) was assessed by oxygen-dependent quenching of phosphorescence. Measurements were obtained on the buccal mucosa at baseline and at hourly intervals thereafter. In parallel, cardiac output (CO) was recorded. After induction of sepsis microvascular perfusion and microPO2 were impaired early followed by significant decreases in CO. Although levosimendan and norepinephrine were equally effective in restoring CO, only treatment with levosimendan significantly improved microPO2 after 1 and 2 hours of treatment (9.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 15.1 +/- 2.6 and 16.0 +/- 3.7 mmHg; p < 0.05). Microvascular perfusion was not significantly influenced by any of the treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, treatment with levosimendan and norepinephrine showed comparable effects in restoring CO and had no significant influence on microvascular perfusion. However, only levosimendan significantly improved microPO2, suggesting that a mechanism relatively independent of macrocirculatory hemodynamics and overall microvascular perfusion might account for these observations.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of norepinephrine and levosimendan on microvascular perfusion and oxygenation in a rat model of septic shock. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory animal study. SETTING: Research laboratory in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Forty Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Sepsis was induced in 32 animals by cecal ligation and puncture. Eight animals served as sham controls. Animals were randomly assigned to five groups: 1) fluid resuscitation (25 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1)), 2) fluid resuscitation plus norepinephrine (0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), 3) fluid resuscitation plus levosimendan (0.3 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), 4) no treatment and 5) sham control. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Microvascular perfusion was quantitated using sidestream darkfield imaging and microvascular oxygenation (microPO2) was assessed by oxygen-dependent quenching of phosphorescence. Measurements were obtained on the buccal mucosa at baseline and at hourly intervals thereafter. In parallel, cardiac output (CO) was recorded. After induction of sepsis microvascular perfusion and microPO2 were impaired early followed by significant decreases in CO. Although levosimendan and norepinephrine were equally effective in restoring CO, only treatment with levosimendan significantly improved microPO2 after 1 and 2 hours of treatment (9.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 15.1 +/- 2.6 and 16.0 +/- 3.7 mmHg; p < 0.05). Microvascular perfusion was not significantly influenced by any of the treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In this model, treatment with levosimendan and norepinephrine showed comparable effects in restoring CO and had no significant influence on microvascular perfusion. However, only levosimendan significantly improved microPO2, suggesting that a mechanism relatively independent of macrocirculatory hemodynamics and overall microvascular perfusion might account for these observations.
Authors: Patrick Scheiermann; Devan Ahluwalia; Sandra Hoegl; Andrea Dolfen; Marc Revermann; Bernhard Zwissler; Heiko Muhl; Kim A Boost; Christian Hofstetter Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Andrea Morelli; Abele Donati; Christian Ertmer; Sebastian Rehberg; Matthias Lange; Alessandra Orecchioni; Valeria Cecchini; Giovanni Landoni; Paolo Pelaia; Paolo Pietropaoli; Hugo Van Aken; Jean-Louis Teboul; Can Ince; Martin Westphal Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Andreas García-Bardon; Jens Kamuf; Alexander Ziebart; Tanghua Liu; Nadia Krebs; Bastian Dünges; Robert F Kelm; Svenja Morsbach; Kristin Mohr; Axel Heimann; Erik K Hartmann; Serge C Thal Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Robert M L'E Orme; Gavin D Perkins; Daniel F McAuley; Kathleen D Liu; Alexina J Mason; Andrea Morelli; Mervyn Singer; Deborah Ashby; Anthony C Gordon Journal: Trials Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 2.279