Literature DB >> 18496273

Preload sensitivity of the Jarvik 2000 and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices.

Hassan A Khalil1, William E Cohn, Ralph W Metcalfe, O H Frazier.   

Abstract

The in vitro sensitivity of continuous flow pumps to preload and afterload pressure has been well characterized. We compared flow in the Jarvik 2000 and HeartMate II continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) at different inflow and outflow pressures and different pump speeds. This allowed us to measure the impact of a changing inflow pressure on the pump flow rate at different speeds but against a constant afterload. The resulting preload sensitivity curves showed that, overall, both LVADs have a mean preload sensitivity of 0.07 L/min/mm Hg in the physiologic ranges of pressures and flows encountered during normal operation. The HeartMate II pump had an increased preload sensitivity (up to approximately 0.1 L/min/mm Hg) as the preload was increased. The preload sensitivity of the Jarvik 2000 LVAD was more variable, having several peaks and troughs as the preload was increased. In future LVADs, improved preload sensitivity may allow passive regulation of pump output, optimize ventricular unloading, and decrease the risk of ventricular suction by the pump.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18496273     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318173e0f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  8 in total

1.  CrossTalk proposal: Blood flow pulsatility in left ventricular assist device patients is essential to maintain normal brain physiology.

Authors:  Eric J Stöhr; Barry J McDonnell; Paolo C Colombo; Joshua Z Willey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Preload sensitivity in cardiac assist devices.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Akira Shiose; Alex Massiello; David J Horvath; Leonard A R Golding; Sangjin Lee; Randall C Starling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Physiology of the Assisted Circulation in Cardiogenic Shock: A State-of-the-Art Perspective.

Authors:  Julien Guihaire; Francois Haddad; Mita Hoppenfeld; Myriam Amsallem; Jeffrey W Christle; Clark Owyang; Khizer Shaikh; Joe L Hsu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Implantable continuous-flow right ventricular assist device: lessons learned in the development of a cleveland clinic device.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Akira Shiose; Alex L Massiello; David J Horvath; Leonard A R Golding; Sangjin Lee; Randall C Starling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Preservation of native aortic valve flow and full hemodynamic support with the TORVAD using a computational model of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Mitchell J George; Kay-Won Chang; Erik R Larson; Thomas D Pate; Mark Kurusz; Raul G Longoria; Richard W Smalling
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Focused review on transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of patients with continuous axial left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Yan Topilsky; Simon Maltais; Jae K Oh; Fawn W Atchison; Louis P Perrault; Michel Carrier; Soon J Park
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Perioperative management of a patient with an axial-flow rotary ventricular assist device for laparoscopic ileo-colectomy.

Authors:  Subramanian Sathishkumar; R Kodavatiganti; S Plummer; K High
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01

Review 8.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Complicates the Exercise Physiology of Oxygen Transport and Uptake in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Erik H Van Iterson
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2019-11-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.