Literature DB >> 18495369

Investigating the temporal effects of respiratory-gated and intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment delivery on in vitro survival: an experimental and theoretical study.

Paul J Keall1, Michael Chang, Stanley Benedict, Howard Thames, S Sastry Vedam, Peck-Sun Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To experimentally and theoretically investigate the temporal effects of respiratory-gated and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment delivery on in vitro survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Experiments were designed to isolate the effects of periodic irradiation (gating), partial tumor irradiation (IMRT), and extended treatment time (gating and IMRT). V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells were irradiated to 2 Gy with four delivery methods and a clonogenic assay performed. Theoretical incomplete repair model calculations were performed using the incomplete repair model.
RESULTS: Treatment times ranged from 1.67 min (conformal radiotherapy, CRT) to 15 min (gated IMRT). Survival fraction calculations ranged from 68.2% for CRT to 68.7% for gated IMRT. For the same treatment time (5 min), gated delivery alone and IMRT delivery alone both had a calculated survival fraction of 68.3%. The experimental values ranged from 65.7% +/- 1.0% to 67.3% +/- 1.3%, indicating no significant difference between the experimental observations and theoretical calculations.
CONCLUSION: The theoretical results predicted that of the three temporal effects of radiation delivery caused by gating and IMRT, extended treatment time was the dominant effect. Care should be taken clinically to ensure that the use of gated IMRT does not significantly increase treatment times, by evaluating appropriate respiratory gating duty cycles and IMRT delivery complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18495369     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Breath-hold MR-HIFU hyperthermia: phantom and in vivo feasibility.

Authors:  Chenchen Bing; Bingbing Cheng; Robert M Staruch; Joris Nofiele; Michelle Wodzak Staruch; Debra Szczepanski; Alan Farrow-Gillespie; Adeline Yang; Theodore W Laetsch; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.914

2.  Applications of IMAT in cervical esophageal cancer radiotherapy: a comparison with fixed-field IMRT in dosimetry and implementation.

Authors:  Yong Yin; Jinhu Chen; Ligang Xing; Xiaoling Dong; Tonghai Liu; Jie Lu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Performance evaluation of respiratory motion-synchronized dynamic IMRT delivery.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; K J Maria Das; Arpita Agarwal; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  Can high dose rates used in cancer radiotherapy change therapeutic effectiveness?

Authors:  Maria Konopacka; Jacek Rogoliński; Aleksander Sochanik; Krzysztof Ślosarek
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2017-01-12

5.  Delivery of Radiation at the Lowest Dose Rate by a Modern Linear Accelerator is Most Effective in Inhibiting Prostate Cancer Growth.

Authors:  Keren Tazat; Oleg Reshetnyak; Natan Shtraus; Ifat Sayag; Nicola J Mabjeesh; Sharon Amir
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Estimation of cell response in fractionation radiotherapy using different methods derived from linear quadratic model.

Authors:  Safoora Nikzad; Bijan Hashemi; Golshan Mahmoudi; Milad Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Correlation between intrafractional motion and dosimetric changes for prostate IMRT: Comparison of different adaptive strategies.

Authors:  Nami Saito; Daniela Schmitt; Mark Bangert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.