Literature DB >> 18494747

Cost-effectiveness of early versus late cinacalcet treatment in addition to standard care for secondary renal hyperparathyroidism in the USA.

Joshua A Ray1, Rohit Borker, Beth Barber, William J Valentine, Vasily Belozeroff, Andrew J Palmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this research was to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness of treating patients with cinacalcet early (when parathyroid hormone [PTH] levels are in the range of 300-500 pg/ml) versus delaying treatment with cinacalcet (cinacalcet initiated when PTH levels are > 800 pg/ml) in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in the US setting.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate the effects of early versus delayed use of cinacalcet (plus standard of care). Four different PTH ranges (< or = 300 pg/ml; 301-500 pg/ml; 501-800 pg/ml; > 800 pg/ml) were used to represent four different health states within the Markov model. Associated with each Markov state (PTH range) were varying risks of major SHPT complications, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), fracture (Fx), and parathyroidectomy (PTx). Baseline cohort characteristics and risks of CVD, Fx, and PTx by PTH category were derived from a large US renal database and published sources. Costs were estimated from the US Renal Data System database and reported in 2006 US Dollars ($). Clinical and economic outcomes were discounted at 3.0% per annum.
RESULTS: Early treatment was projected to improve quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.337 years compared to delaying treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $17,275 per QALY gained.
CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment with cinacalcet was associated with improvements in QALYs and would represent good value for money compared to delaying treatment with cinacalcet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18494747     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00329.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cinacalcet: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in secondary hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A Decision-Analytic Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Etelcalcetide vs. Cinacalcet.

Authors:  Björn Stollenwerk; Sergio Iannazzo; Ron Akehurst; Michael Adena; Andrew Briggs; Bastian Dehmel; Patrick Parfrey; Vasily Belozeroff
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Optimizing the cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder.

Authors:  Shunsuke Goto; Hirotaka Komaba; Masafumi Fukagawa; Shinichi Nishi
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2013-12

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of cinacalcet for haemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in China: evaluation based on the EVOLVE trial.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Dongsheng Hong; Kuifen Ma; Bin Wu; Xiaoyang Lu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.