Literature DB >> 18494340

Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight platform.

Jing Yu1, Hui Chen, Fang Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided LASIK.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled study comprised 200 eyes of 100 young patients who underwent LASIK for myopia and astigmatism. Patients were randomly divided into two different treatment groups: standard ablation using wavefront-optimized profiles (wavefront-optimized group) and aberration customized aspheric treatment ablation (customized group) using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO platform. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding reasons for surgery, satisfaction, and visual symptoms. Patients were followed for 6 months.
RESULTS: The most frequent motivating factor for surgery was to improve uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in the wavefront-optimized and customized groups (both 100%), followed by freedom from spectacles (86.9% vs 96.3%). At 6 months postoperatively, over 95% of patients in both groups reported their UCVA was as good as anticipated and they were satisfied with the surgery and would recommend the operation to a friend or family member. Satisfaction was not correlated with age, attempted refractive error, residual refractive error, postoperative UCVA, or root-mean-square higher order aberration. The rate of postoperative overall visual symptoms was reduced and the mean analog scores of the symptoms in both groups did not change significantly postoperatively (P > .05). The rate of visual symptoms such as glare (8.7% vs 7.4%), halo (0% vs 7.4%), and night driving difficulty (8.7% vs 3.7%) decreased after LASIK at 6 months postoperatively in the wavefront-optimized and customized groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction was achieved in young myopic patients who underwent wavefront-guided and standard ("wavefront-optimized") LASIK. The rate of visual symptoms such as glare, halo, and night driving difficulty decreased postoperatively after both treatment protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18494340     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080501-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  The effect of the asphericity of myopic laser ablation profiles on the induction of wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Jens Bühren; Lana Nagy; Geunyoung Yoon; Scott MacRae; Thomas Kohnen; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  An evaluation of the Bausch & Lomb Zywave aberrometer.

Authors:  Michael J Dobos; Michael D Twa; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Ning-Li Wang; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave ® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Brent S Betts; Daniel S Churgin; Maylon Hsu; Marcus Neuffer; Shameema Sikder; Dane Church; Mark D Mifflin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-20

5.  Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVueTM STAR S4 IRTM in photorefractive keratectomy: analysis of visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Daniel S Churgin; Brent S Betts; Maylon Hsu; Shameema Sikder; Marcus Neuffer; Dane Church; Mark D Mifflin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-22

6.  Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer.

Authors:  Sarah Moussa; Alois K Dexl; Eva M Krall; Eva M Arlt; Günther Grabner; Josef Ruckhofer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-12

Review 7.  Outcome comparison between wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaled M Hamam; Mohamed I Gbreel; Randa Elsheikh; Amira Y Benmelouka; Yassamine Ouerdane; Amr K Hassan; Aboalmagd Hamdallah; Ahmed B Elsnhory; Anas Z Nourelden; Ahmed T Masoud; Asmaa A Ali; Khaled M Ragab; Ahmed M Ibrahim
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Satisfaction level of physicians who have undergone corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Lee; Ji-Won Kwon; Joon Young Hyon; Young Keun Han
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.