Literature DB >> 18494173

Genetic damage in mammalian somatic cells exposed to radiofrequency radiation: a meta-analysis of data from 63 publications (1990-2005).

Thomas J Prihoda.   

Abstract

During the last several decades, numerous researchers have examined the potential of in vitro and /or in vivo exposure of radiofrequency( RF) radiation to damage the genetic material in mammalian somatic cells. A meta-analysis of reported data was conducted to obtain a quantitative estimate ( with 95% confidence intervals) of genotoxicity in RF-radiation-exposed cells compared with sham-exposed/unexposed control cells. The extent of genotoxicity was assessed for various end points, including single- and double-strand breaks in the DNA, incidence of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges. Among the several variables in the experimental protocols used in individual investigations, the influence of three specific variables related to RF-radiation exposure characteristics was examined in the meta-analysis: frequency, specific absorption rate, and exposure as continuous-wave, pulsed-wave and occupationally exposed/cell phone users. The overall data indicated that (1) the difference between RF-radiation exposure was small with few exceptions; (2) at certain RF radiation exposure conditions, there were statistically significant increases in genotoxicity for some end points; and (3) the mean indices for chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in RF-radiation -exposed and sham-/unexposed controls were within the spontaneous levels reported in the historical database. Considerable evidence for publication bias was found in the meta-analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18494173     DOI: 10.1667/rr0987.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  7 in total

1.  Adaptive response in mice exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields: primary DNA damage.

Authors:  Bingcheng Jiang; Jihua Nie; Zhen Zhou; Jie Zhang; Jian Tong; Yi Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  International and national expert group evaluations: biological/health effects of radiofrequency fields.

Authors:  Maria R Scarfi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Bioelectromagnetics: Prediction Models and Feature Selection Techniques Using Data from Weak Radiofrequency Radiation Effect on Human and Animals Cells.

Authors:  Malka N Halgamuge
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system.

Authors:  Nisarg R Desai; Kavindra K Kesari; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Cell type-dependent induction of DNA damage by 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields does not result in significant cellular dysfunctions.

Authors:  Shanshan Xu; Guangdi Chen; Chunjing Chen; Chuan Sun; Danying Zhang; Manuel Murbach; Niels Kuster; Qunli Zeng; Zhengping Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The controversy about a possible relationship between mobile phone use and cancer.

Authors:  Michael Kundi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  RAPD Profiling, DNA Fragmentation, and Histomorphometric Examination in Brains of Wistar Rats Exposed to Indoor 2.5 Ghz Wi-Fi Devices Radiation.

Authors:  A O Ibitayo; O B Afolabi; A J Akinyemi; T I Ojiezeh; K O Adekoya; O O Ojewunmi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.