Literature DB >> 18493126

The implications of genetic susceptibility for the prevention of colorectal cancer: a qualitative study of older adults' understanding.

Jayne Lucke1, Wayne Hall, Bree Ryan, Neville Owen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether public understandings of inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer may undermine preparedness to respond to preventive messages.
METHODS: Structured in-depth interviews with 31 women and men, aged 50 years and over.
RESULTS: Most participants viewed genetic factors as prompts for taking preventive measures rather than as reasons for fatalism and inaction. They were optimistic about the potential benefits of new developments in cancer prevention and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: There was little evidence of perceived genetic determinism in relation to colorectal cancer, but there were some significant misunderstandings about causes, prevention and treatment. These findings have important implications for public health communications about the contribution of genetics to cancer causation. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493126     DOI: 10.1159/000121399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Genet        ISSN: 1422-2795


  4 in total

1.  "The cancer bond": exploring the formation of cancer risk perception in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Laura M Koehly; Susan K Peterson; Margarette Shegog; Sally W Vernon; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Deborah Bowen; Lawrence C Brody; Celeste M Condit; Robert T Croyle; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury; Laura M Koehly; Bruce R Korf; Theresa M Marteau; Kenneth McLeroy; Kevin Patrick; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Comprehension and personal value of negative non-diagnostic genetic panel testing.

Authors:  Christin Hoell; Sharon Aufox; Nora Nashawaty; Melanie F Myers; Maureen E Smith
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.