Literature DB >> 18492741

Underestimation of airflow obstruction among young adults using FEV1/FVC <70% as a fixed cut-off: a longitudinal evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes.

I Cerveri1, A G Corsico, S Accordini, R Niniano, E Ansaldo, J M Antó, N Künzli, C Janson, J Sunyer, D Jarvis, C Svanes, T Gislason, J Heinrich, J P Schouten, M Wjst, P Burney, R de Marco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of airflow obstruction is particularly important among young adults because they are more likely to benefit from intervention. Using the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) to forced vital capacity (FVC) (FEV(1)/FVC) <70% fixed ratio, airflow obstruction may be underdiagnosed. The lower limit of normal (LLN), which is statistically defined by the lower fifth percentile of a reference population, is physiologically appropriate but it still needs a clinical validation.
METHODS: To evaluate the characteristics and longitudinal outcomes of subjects misidentified as normal by the fixed ratio with respect to the LLN, 6249 participants (aged 20-44 years) in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey were examined and divided into three groups (absence of airflow obstruction by the LLN and the fixed ratio; presence of airflow obstruction only by the LLN; presence of airflow obstruction by the two criteria) for 1991-1993. LLN equations were obtained from normal non-smoking participants. A set of clinical and functional outcomes was evaluated in 1999-2002.
RESULTS: The misidentified subjects were 318 (5.1%); only 45.6% of the subjects with airflow obstruction by the LLN were also identified by the fixed cut-off. At baseline, FEV(1) (107%, 97%, 85%) progressively decreased and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (slope 7.84, 6.32, 5.57) progressively increased across the three groups. During follow-up, misidentified subjects had a significantly higher risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a significantly higher use of health resources (medicines, emergency department visits/hospital admissions) because of breathing problems than subjects without airflow obstruction (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show the importance of using statistically derived spirometric criteria to identify airflow obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18492741     DOI: 10.1136/thx.2008.095554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  34 in total

1.  Do symptoms predict COPD in smokers?

Authors:  Jill A Ohar; Alireza Sadeghnejad; Deborah A Meyers; James F Donohue; Eugene R Bleecker
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Improving the differential diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

Authors:  David B Price; Barbara P Yawn; Rupert C M Jones
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  The diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Rainer Burkhardt; Wulf Pankow
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of spirometry in primary care.

Authors:  Antonius Schneider; Lena Gindner; Lisa Tilemann; Tjard Schermer; Geert-Jan Dinant; Franz Joachim Meyer; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.317

5.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.

Authors:  Dheeraj Gupta; Ritesh Agarwal; Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal; V N Maturu; Sahajal Dhooria; K T Prasad; Inderpaul S Sehgal; Lakshmikant B Yenge; Aditya Jindal; Navneet Singh; A G Ghoshal; G C Khilnani; J K Samaria; S N Gaur; D Behera
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2013-07

Review 6.  Heterogeneity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: from phenotype to genotype.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Xiaomao Xu; Fei Xiao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Prevalence of airflow obstruction in nonsmoking older individuals using different spirometric criteria: the AGES Reykjavik Study.

Authors:  Solrun Bjork Runarsdottir; Gunnar Gudmundsson; Thor Aspelund; Tamara B Harris; Lenore J Launer; Vilmundur Gudnason; Thorarinn Gislason
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 8.  Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Stefano Guerra
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-10

9.  Comparison of spirometry criteria for the diagnosis of COPD: results from the BOLD study.

Authors:  W M Vollmer; Thorn Gíslason; P Burney; P L Enright; A Gulsvik; A Kocabas; A S Buist
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 10.  The importance of the assessment of pulmonary function in COPD.

Authors:  Kristina L Bailey
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.