Literature DB >> 18492398

Biopsy for malignant melanoma--are we following the guidelines?

S Tadiparthi1, S Panchani, A Iqbal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines for suspected malignant melanoma recommend a prompt, full-thickness excision biopsy allowing diagnosis and assessment of the Breslow thickness. Incisional biopsy is acceptable only for extensive facial lentigo maligna or acral melanoma. Punch, shave and other types of biopsies do not allow pathological staging and are, therefore, not recommended. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 referrals for histology-proven malignant melanoma were assessed retrospectively over a 1-year period (2005).
RESULTS: Of the 100 patients included in this study, 52 were male and 48 female. Ages ranged from 18-91 years, with a mean of 63 years. Origin of referrals was: dermatology, 63%; general practitioner (GP), 33%; and other sources in the remaining 4% of cases. Malignant melanoma was suspected in 84% and a benign lesion in remaining 16% of patients. However, only 56% of the patients were seen in our unit within 14 days of the referral as per the 2-week cancer rule. In these 100 patients, various types of biopsy were performed: 50 were referred without biopsy, 17 excision, 20 punch, 3 shave, 1 curettage, and 1 incisional biopsy. The type of biopsy was not recorded in the remaining 3 patients. Of the GP group, 48% were referred without biopsy, 12% had excision and 3% had incisional biopsies. The remaining 30% were punch, shave biopsies, and even curettage, inconsistent with current recommendations. Of the dermatology group, 54% were referred without biopsy, 21% underwent excision biopsy and 22% were punch biopsies. In total, 20 punch biopsies were performed, of which 7 were for lesions on the face ranging from 1.7-25 mm in size. The remaining punch biopsies were for lesions on the trunk or limbs (4-50 mm). Of the 20 punch biopsies performed, Breslow thickness was available in only 9 cases (45%). Sixteen of the punch biopsies were done when malignant melanoma was suspected and lesion otherwise was suitable for excisional biopsy. In the GP group, 3 shave biopsies and 1 curettage were performed, of which malignant melanoma was clinically suspected in one patient. The Breslow thickness was not obtained from any of the shave biopsies or curettage cases. Of the 17 excision biopsies performed, 3 were incompletely excised (2 by dermatology and 1 by GP).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of biopsies are inappropriate and inconsistent with the malignant melanoma guidelines. Punch biopsies are performed even when malignant melanoma is clinically suspected and excision biopsy is feasible. Only a small proportion of patients appear to be seen on an urgent basis within 14 days of referral. Such factors can lead to a delay in diagnosis, subsequent definitive treatment and adversely affect patient outcome. This study identifies a need to provide feedback and education to sources of malignant melanoma referrals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18492398      PMCID: PMC2647196          DOI: 10.1308/003588408X285856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  12 in total

1.  UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  J A N Bishop; P G Corrie; J Evans; M E Gore; P N Hall; N Kirkham; D L L Roberts; A V Anstey; R J Barlow; N H Cox
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2002-01

Review 2.  Biopsy techniques. Diagnosis of melanoma.

Authors:  Neil A Swanson; Ken K Lee; Annalisa Gorman; Han N Lee
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 3.  Melanoma.

Authors:  Arlo J Miller; Martin C Mihm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Suspected skin malignancy: a comparison of diagnoses of family practitioners and dermatologists in 493 patients.

Authors:  A Morrison; S O'Loughlin; F C Powell
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.736

5.  Performance of skin biopsies by general practitioners.

Authors:  L J McWilliam; F Knox; N Wilkinson; P Oogarah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

6.  The relationship between biopsy technique and uncertainty in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma.

Authors:  R J Pariser; A Divers; A Nassar
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  1999-11

7.  Effect of initial biopsy procedure on prognosis in Stage 1 invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma: review of 1086 patients.

Authors:  V C Lees; J C Briggs
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A critique of techniques for biopsy of clinically suspected malignant melanomas.

Authors:  E Macy-Roberts; A B Ackerman
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.533

9.  Excision biopsy of malignant melanoma by general practitioners in south east Scotland 1982-91.

Authors:  R M Herd; J A Hunter; K M McLaren; U Chetty; A C Watson; J M Gollock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-12-12

10.  Sensitivity of diagnosis of malignant melanoma: a clinicopathologic study with a critical assessment of biopsy techniques.

Authors:  D D Witheiler; C J Cockerell
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.960

View more
  9 in total

1.  Current biopsy practices for suspected melanoma: A survey of family physicians in Southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  Kristina Lutz; Victoria Hayward; Mariamma Joseph; Eric Wong; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zager; Steven N Hochwald; Suroosh S Marzban; Rony Francois; Kimberly M Law; Ashley H Davis; Jane L Messina; Vladimir Vincek; Christina Mitchell; Ann Church; Edward M Copeland; Vernon K Sondak; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice.

Authors:  Sean Robison; Marjan Kljakovic; Peter Barry
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of early cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  O A Orzan; A Șandru; C R Jecan
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma.

Authors:  Alberto Falk Delgado; Sayid Zommorodi; Anna Falk Delgado
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Impact of Shave Biopsy on Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omid Ahmadi; Moushumi Das; Behzad Hajarizadeh; Jon A Mathy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Effect of changes in Breslow thickness between the initial punch biopsy results and final pathology reports in acral lentiginous melanoma patients.

Authors:  Tae Hyung Kim; Jin Cheol Kim; Ji Eun Kwon; You Chan Kim; Jee Woong Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Malignant melanoma misdiagnosed as diabetic foot ulcer: A case report.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Dawei Chen; Xingwu Ran
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Vulvar and Vaginal Melanomas-The Darker Shades of Gynecological Cancers.

Authors:  Elena-Codruța Dobrică; Cristina Vâjâitu; Carmen Elena Condrat; Dragoș Crețoiu; Ileana Popa; Bogdan Severus Gaspar; Nicolae Suciu; Sanda Maria Crețoiu; Valentin Nicolae Varlas
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.