Literature DB >> 18492099

Status of minimal residual disease after induction predicts outcome in both standard and high-risk Ph-negative adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The Polish Adult Leukemia Group ALL 4-2002 MRD Study.

Jerzy Holowiecki1, Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis, Sebastian Giebel, Krystyna Jagoda, Beata Stella-Holowiecka, Beata Piatkowska-Jakubas, Monika Paluszewska, Ilona Seferynska, Krzysztof Lewandowski, Marek Kielbinski, Anna Czyz, Agnieszka Balana-Nowak, Maria Król, Aleksander B Skotnicki, Wieslaw W Jedrzejczak, Krzysztof Warzocha, Andrzej Lange, Andrzej Hellmann.   

Abstract

The treatment of adults with Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) depends on the presence of risk factors including age, white blood cell count, immunophenotype and time to complete remission. In recent years, status of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been postulated as an additional risk criterion. This study prospectively evaluated the significance of MRD. Patients were treated with a uniform Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) 4-2002 protocol. MRD status was assessed after induction and consolidation by multiparametric flow cytometry. Out of 132 patients included (age, 17-60 years), 116 patients were suitable for analysis. MRD level >/=0.1% of bone marrow cells after induction was found to be a strong and independent predictor for relapse in the whole study population (P < 0.0001), as well as in the standard risk (SR, P = 0.0003) and high-risk (P = 0.008) groups. The impact of MRD after consolidation on outcome was not significant. The combination of MRD status with conventional risk stratification system identified a subgroup of patients allocated to the SR group with MRD <0.1% after induction who had a very low risk of relapse of 9% at 3 years as opposed to 71% in the remaining subjects (P = 0.001). We conclude that MRD evaluation after induction should be considered with conventional risk criteria for treatment decisions in adult ALL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18492099     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  41 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for the assessment and management of measurable residual disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A consensus of North American experts.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Elias Jabbour; Maher Albitar; Marcos de Lima; Lia Gore; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Aaron C Logan; Jae Park; Farhad Ravandi; Bijal Shah; Jerald Radich; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Guangchun Song; Christopher Clark; Laura Key; Peixin Liu; Mohammad Mehrpooya; Patricia Stow; Xiaoping Su; Sheila Shurtleff; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: How to Recognize and Treat It.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Elias Jabbour
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Should minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia be standard of care?

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Adult B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients.

Authors:  Olga Sala Torra; Megan Othus; David W Williamson; Brent Wood; Ilan Kirsch; Harlan Robins; Lan Beppu; Margaret R O'Donnell; Stephen J Forman; Frederick R Appelbaum; Jerald P Radich
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Improving results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: an analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Sebastian Giebel; Myriam Labopin; Gerard Socié; Dietrich Beelen; Paul Browne; Liisa Volin; Slawomira Kyrcz-Krzemien; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Mahmoud Aljurf; Depei Wu; Mauricette Michallet; Renate Arnold; Mohamad Mohty; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Critical evaluation of the utility of pre- and post-therapy immunophenotypes in assessment of measurable residual disease in B-ALL.

Authors:  Nupur Das; Ritu Gupta; Sanjeev Kumar Gupta; Sameer Bakhshi; Rachna Seth; Chandan Kumar; Sandeep Rai; Saroj Singh; Vijay Kumar Prajapati; Ajay Gogia; Ranjit Kumar Sahoo; Atul Sharma; Lalit Kumar
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 8.  Role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Michael S Mathisen; Susan O'Brien; Deborah Thomas; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 9.  Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Dasatinib-induced complete molecular response after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia resistant to prior imatinib-containing regimen: a case report and discussion.

Authors:  Anna Czyz; Krzysztof Lewandowski; Renata Kroll; Mieczysław Komarnicki
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.