Literature DB >> 18491704

Incorporation of large amounts of gentamicin sulphate into acrylic bone cement: effect on handling and mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation.

N J Dunne1, J Hill, P McAfee, R Kirkpatrick, S Patrick, M Tunney.   

Abstract

Bacterial infection remains a significant complication following total joint replacement. If infection is suspected when revision surgery is being performed, a large dose of antibiotic, usually gentamicin sulphate, is often blended with the acrylic bone cement powder in an attempt to reduce the risk of recurrent infection. In this in-vitro study the effect of small and large doses of gentamicin sulphate on the handling and mechanical properties of the cement, gentamicin release from the cement, and in-vitro biofilm formation by clinical Staphylococcus spp. isolates on the cement was determined. An increase in gentamicin loading of 1, 2, 3, or 4 g, in a cement powder mass of 40 g, resulted in a significant decrease in the compressive and four-point bending strength, but a significant increase in the amount of gentamicin released over a 72h period. When overt infection was modelled, using Staphylococcus spp. clinical isolates at an inoculum of 1 x 10(7) colony-forming units/ml, an increase in the amount of gentamicin (1, 2, 3, or 4 g) added to 40 g of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement resulted in an initial decrease in bacterial colonization but this beneficial effect was no longer apparent by 72 h, with the bacterial strains forming biofilms on the cements despite the release of high levels of gentamicin. The findings suggest that orthopaedic surgeons should carefully consider the clinical consequences of blending large doses (1 g or more per 40 g of poly(methyl methacrylate)) of gentamicin into Palacos R bone cement for use in revision surgery as the increased gentamicin loading does not prevent bacterial biofilm formation and the effect on the mechanical properties could be important to the longevity of the prosthetic joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491704     DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  17 in total

1.  A preliminary study of the release of quaternary ammonium antimicrobial compounds from acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  Manojgna Mathey; Vijaya Surana; Mark Edwards; John W Nicholson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Loading with vancomycin does not decrease gentamicin elution in gentamicin premixed bone cement.

Authors:  Sebastian P Boelch; Martin C Jordan; Joerg Arnholdt; Maximilian Rudert; Martin Luedemann; Andre F Steinert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Use of antibiotic-loaded cement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedro Hinarejos; Pau Guirro; Lluis Puig-Verdie; Raul Torres-Claramunt; Joan Leal-Blanquet; Juan Sanchez-Soler; Joan Carles Monllau
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

4.  Not all approved antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement brands are the same: ranking using the utility materials selection concept.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Calcium sulphate mixed with antibiotics does not decrease efficacy against Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes), in vitro study.

Authors:  Anne Couture; Valéry Lavergne; Emilie Sandman; Jean-Michel Leduc; Benoit Benoit; Stéphane Leduc; Dominique M Rouleau
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-28

6.  Elution and Mechanical Strength of Vancomycin-Loaded Bone Cement: In Vitro Study of the Influence of Brand Combination.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsun Lee; Ching-Lung Tai; Szu-Yuan Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Yu-Han Chang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Identifying alternative antibiotics that elute from calcium sulfate beads for treatment of orthopedic infections.

Authors:  Ashley E Levack; Kathleen Turajane; Daniel A Driscoll; Xu Yang; Andy O Miller; Mathias P Bostrom; David S Wellman; Alberto V Carli
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 9.  Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Enrica Verné; Alessandro Massè; Davide Deledda; Sara Ferraris; Marta Miola; Fabrizio Galetto; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-08-07

10.  A novel liposomal drug delivery system for PMMA bone cements.

Authors:  Wayne Nishio Ayre; James C Birchall; Samuel L Evans; Stephen P Denyer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.