Literature DB >> 18491388

Taking advantage of local structure descriptors to analyze interresidue contacts in protein structures and protein complexes.

Juliette Martin1, Leslie Regad, Catherine Etchebest, Anne-Claude Camproux.   

Abstract

Interresidue protein contacts in proteins structures and at protein-protein interface are classically described by the amino acid types of interacting residues and the local structural context of the contact, if any, is described using secondary structures. In this study, we present an alternate analysis of interresidue contact using local structures defined by the structural alphabet introduced by Camproux et al. This structural alphabet allows to describe a 3D structure as a sequence of prototype fragments called structural letters, of 27 different types. Each residue can then be assigned to a particular local structure, even in loop regions. The analysis of interresidue contacts within protein structures defined using Voronoï tessellations reveals that pairwise contact specificity is greater in terms of structural letters than amino acids. Using a simple heuristic based on specificity score comparison, we find that 74% of the long-range contacts within protein structures are better described using structural letters than amino acid types. The investigation is extended to a set of protein-protein complexes, showing that the similar global rules apply as for intraprotein contacts, with 64% of the interprotein contacts best described by local structures. We then present an evaluation of pairing functions integrating structural letters to decoy scoring and show that some complexes could benefit from the use of structural letter-based pairing functions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491388     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  6 in total

1.  Driving forces for transmembrane alpha-helix oligomerization.

Authors:  Alex J Sodt; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Structural alphabets derived from attractors in conformational space.

Authors:  Alessandro Pandini; Arianna Fornili; Jens Kleinjung
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Protein binding hot spots and the residue-residue pairing preference: a water exclusion perspective.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Jinyan Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Comparison of tertiary structures of proteins in protein-protein complexes with unbound forms suggests prevalence of allostery in signalling proteins.

Authors:  Lakshmipuram S Swapna; Swapnil Mahajan; Alexandre G de Brevern; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2012-05-03

5.  SA-Mot: a web server for the identification of motifs of interest extracted from protein loops.

Authors:  Leslie Regad; Adrien Saladin; Julien Maupetit; Colette Geneix; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Exploring the potential of a structural alphabet-based tool for mining multiple target conformations and target flexibility insight.

Authors:  Leslie Regad; Jean-Baptiste Chéron; Dhoha Triki; Caroline Senac; Delphine Flatters; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.