Literature DB >> 18491073

[Hip ultrasound screening in Germany. Results and comparison with other screening procedures].

N Ihme1, L Altenhofen, R von Kries, F U Niethard.   

Abstract

General ultrasound screening programmes to determine DDH are still a matter of discussion due to a lack of evidence. To facilitate further discussions this review gives an overview of the international data and literature concerning the different screening policies taking into account the results of the German evaluation study from 1997 to 2002. General ultrasound screening programmes are established in Germany and Austria. The analysis of the German screening showed 535 cases of DDH with first operative procedure (age 10 weeks to 5 years) that were treated as inpatients: 66% underwent a closed reduction, 11% an open reduction and 23% an osteotomy of the acetabulum/femur. The number of children who had no ultrasound of the hip before diagnosis decreased from 22% in the first year to 8% in the last. The first ultrasound examination was without pathological findings in 12% of the cases. Capture-recapture estimates suggested that 52% of cases were reported, so that the incidence for first operation due to DDH was 0.26 per 1,000 live births in 1997. This is much lower than in other countries and 4/5 less than the time before screening with ultrasound in Germany. At most 42% of the cases might be preventable by an improvement of the screening programme, but at least 51% would not be prevented. The German ultrasound screening programme has proved to be effective. Improvement of economic efficiency is still possible. Therefore, the German programme with different screening times can be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491073     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1237-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.004


  32 in total

1.  Splintage in developmental dysplasia of the hip: how low can we go?

Authors:  Jayanth S Sampath; Susan Deakin; Robin W Paton
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  E A Roovers; M M Boere-Boonekamp; R M Castelein; G A Zielhuis; T H Kerkhoff
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  [Early diagnosis of hip dysplasia--arguments for a general ultrasonographic screening].

Authors:  R A Bon; G U Exner
Journal:  Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax       Date:  1992-04-14

4.  [The effect of ultrasonography screening of hips in newborn infants on femur head necrosis and the rate of surgical interventions].

Authors:  C Tschauner; W Klapsch; R Graf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Ischemic necrosis as a complication of treatment of C.D.H.

Authors:  D Tönnis
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Economic evaluation of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of developmental hip dysplasia in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Authors:  Alastair Gray; Diana Elbourne; Carol Dezateux; Andrew King; Anne Quinn; Frances Gardner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Performance, treatment pathways, and effects of alternative policy options for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Dezateux; J Brown; R Arthur; J Karnon; A Parnaby
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography.

Authors:  R Graf
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative screening strategies for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  K Rosendahl; T Markestad; R T Lie; E Sudmann; J T Geitung
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1995-06

10.  Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15,529 newborn infants.

Authors:  K J Holen; A Tegnander; T Bredland; O J Johansen; O D Saether; S H Eik-Nes; T Terjesen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-08
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Managing Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  James Tomlinson; Dominic O'Dowd; James Alfred Fernandes
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  [Congenital hip dysplasia, screening and therapy].

Authors:  A Kolb; R Windhager; C Chiari
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Paediatric hip sonography: current status at German university hospitals].

Authors:  C-D Peterlein; S Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The Value of Hip Ultrasound Screening.

Authors:  Tamara Seidl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  [Pavlik harness for the treatment of congenital hip dysplasia types D III and IV].

Authors:  D Zajonz; S Strobel; M Wojan; N von der Höh; P Brandmaier; C Josten; E Schumann; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mathew D Sewell; Deborah M Eastwood
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Hip joint development in children with type IIb developmental dysplasia.

Authors:  Marcin Sibiński; Emil Adamczyk; Zoe C J Higgs; Marek Synder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluation of primary care 6- to 8-week hip check for diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a 15-year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ronnie Davies; Christopher Talbot; Robin Paton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: impact of sonographic newborn hip screening on the outcome of early treated decentered hip joints-a single center retrospective comparative cohort study based on Graf's method of hip ultrasonography.

Authors:  Christian Tschauner; Frank Fürntrath; Yasaman Saba; Andrea Berghold; Roman Radl
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Monitoring of a hip surveillance programme protects infants from radiation and surgical intervention.

Authors:  David J Milligan; Aidan P Cosgrove
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.