Literature DB >> 18490791

Movement imagery ability: development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire.

Ross Roberts1, Nichola Callow, Lew Hardy, David Markland, Joy Bringer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to amend the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ; Isaac, Marks, & Russell, 1986) in line with contemporary imagery modality and perspective conceptualizations, and to test the validity of the amended questionnaire (i.e., the VMIQ-2). Study 1 had 351 athletes complete the 3-factor (internal visual imagery, external visual imagery, and kinesthetic imagery) 24-item VMIQ-2. Following single-factor confirmatory factor analyses and item deletion, a 12-item version was subject to correlated traits / correlated uniqueness (CTCU) analysis. An acceptable fit was revealed. Study 2 used a different sample of 355 athletes. The CTCU analysis confirmed the factorial validity of the 12-item VMIQ-2. In Study 3, the concurrent and construct validity of the VMIQ-2 was supported. Taken together, the results of the 3 studies provide preliminary support for the revised VMIQ-2 as a psychometrically valid questionnaire.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18490791     DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.2.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol        ISSN: 0895-2779            Impact factor:   3.016


  60 in total

Review 1.  Motor imagery and higher-level cognition: four hurdles before research can sprint forward.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-03-31

2.  "Will you draw me a pelvis?ˮ Dynamic neuro-cognitive imagery improves pelvic schema and graphic-metric representation in people with Parkinson's Disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amit Abraham; Ariel Hart; Ruth Dickstein; Madeleine E Hackney
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  The influence of individual motor imagery ability on cerebral recruitment during gait imagery.

Authors:  Marian van der Meulen; Gilles Allali; Sebastian W Rieger; Frédéric Assal; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Development and evaluation of the See Me Smoke-Free multi-behavioral mHealth app for women smokers.

Authors:  Judith S Gordon; Julie Armin; Melanie D Hingle; Peter Giacobbi; James K Cunningham; Thienne Johnson; Kristopher Abbate; Carol L Howe; Denise J Roe
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Motor imagery effectiveness for mirror reversed movements.

Authors:  Ursula Debarnot; Gaetano Valenza; Stéphane Champely; Enzo Pasquale Scilingo; Danilo De Rossi; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Daytime naps improve motor imagery learning.

Authors:  Ursula Debarnot; Eleonora Castellani; Gaetano Valenza; Laura Sebastiani; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  No sex differences in the TAMI.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-12-06

8.  [German test of the controllability of motor imagery in older adults].

Authors:  N Schott
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  Sleep contribution to motor memory consolidation: a motor imagery study.

Authors:  Ursula Debarnot; Thomas Creveaux; Christian Collet; Julien Doyon; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 10.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.