Tomas G Neilan1, Aruna D Pradhan, Mary Etta King, Arthur E Weyman. 1. Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, YAW-5E, Boston, MA 02115-2696, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: It is general practice to correct cardiac chamber size for body size by the process of scaling or normalization. Normalization is most commonly performed using simple linear or isometric correction; however, there is increasing evidence that this approach may be flawed. Likewise, there is little agreement concerning the appropriate scaling variable (measure of body size) for normalization. Therefore, we aimed to establish the optimal method for correcting the differences in body size in a large population of echocardiographically normal paediatric subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the relative ability of standard size variables including height (HT), body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA), in both isometric and allometric models, to remove the effect of body size in 4109 consecutive echocardiographically normal subjects<18 years of age, using the left atrial dimension (LAD) as a reference standard. Simple linear normalization resulted in significant residual correlations (r=-0.57 to -0.92) of the indexed value with the body size variable, the correlations with weight (WT) and BSA actually increasing. In contrast, correction by the optimal allometric exponent (AE) removed the effects of the indexed variable (residual correlations -0.01 to 0.01), with BW and BSA best removing the effects of all the measures of body size. CONCLUSION: Conventional linear correction for body size is inaccurate in children and paradoxically increases the relationship of the indexed parameter with WT and BSA. Conversely, correction using the optimal AE removes the effect of that variable, with WT best correction for all measures of body size.
AIMS: It is general practice to correct cardiac chamber size for body size by the process of scaling or normalization. Normalization is most commonly performed using simple linear or isometric correction; however, there is increasing evidence that this approach may be flawed. Likewise, there is little agreement concerning the appropriate scaling variable (measure of body size) for normalization. Therefore, we aimed to establish the optimal method for correcting the differences in body size in a large population of echocardiographically normal paediatric subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the relative ability of standard size variables including height (HT), body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA), in both isometric and allometric models, to remove the effect of body size in 4109 consecutive echocardiographically normal subjects<18 years of age, using the left atrial dimension (LAD) as a reference standard. Simple linear normalization resulted in significant residual correlations (r=-0.57 to -0.92) of the indexed value with the body size variable, the correlations with weight (WT) and BSA actually increasing. In contrast, correction by the optimal allometric exponent (AE) removed the effects of the indexed variable (residual correlations -0.01 to 0.01), with BW and BSA best removing the effects of all the measures of body size. CONCLUSION: Conventional linear correction for body size is inaccurate in children and paradoxically increases the relationship of the indexed parameter with WT and BSA. Conversely, correction using the optimal AE removes the effect of that variable, with WT best correction for all measures of body size.
Authors: S M Nidorf; M H Picard; M O Triulzi; J D Thomas; J Newell; M E King; A E Weyman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gabrielle Norrish; Gali Kolt; Elena Cervi; Ella Field; Kathleen Dady; Lidia Ziółkowska; Iacopo Olivotto; Silvia Favilli; Silvia Passantino; Giuseppe Limongelli; Martina Caiazza; Marta Rubino; Anwar Baban; Fabrizio Drago; Karen Mcleod; Maria Ilina; Ruth McGowan; Graham Stuart; Vinay Bhole; Orhan Uzun; Amos Wong; Laz Lazarou; Elspeth Brown; Piers E F Daubeney; Amrit Lota; Grazia Delle Donne; Katie Linter; Sujeev Mathur; Tara Bharucha; Satish Adwani; Jon Searle; Anca Popoiu; Caroline B Jones; Zdenka Reinhardt; Juan Pablo Kaski Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-09-06
Authors: Gabrielle Norrish; Chen Qu; Ella Field; Elena Cervi; Diala Khraiche; Sabine Klaassen; Tiina H Ojala; Gianfranco Sinagra; Hirokuni Yamazawa; Chiara Marrone; Anca Popoiu; Fernando Centeno; Sylvie Schouvey; Iacopo Olivotto; Sharlene M Day; Steve Colan; Joseph Rossano; Samuel G Wittekind; Sara Saberi; Mark Russell; Adam Helms; Jodie Ingles; Christopher Semsarian; Perry M Elliott; Carolyn Y Ho; Rumana Z Omar; Juan P Kaski Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Gabrielle Norrish; Cristian Topriceanu; Chen Qu; Ella Field; Helen Walsh; Lidia Ziółkowska; Iacopo Olivotto; Silvia Passantino; Silvia Favilli; Aris Anastasakis; Vasiliki Vlagkouli; Robert Weintraub; Ingrid King; Elena Biagini; Luca Ragni; Terrence Prendiville; Sophie Duignan; Karen McLeod; Maria Ilina; Adrian Fernández; Regina Bökenkamp; Anwar Baban; Fabrizio Drago; Peter Kubuš; Piers E F Daubeney; Sian Chivers; Georgia Sarquella-Brugada; Sergi Cesar; Chiara Marrone; Constancio Medrano; Reyes Alvarez Garcia-Roves; Orhan Uzun; Ferran Gran; Fernandez J Castro; Juan R Gimeno; Roberto Barriales-Villa; Fernando Rueda; Satish Adwani; Jonathan Searle; Tara Bharucha; Ana Siles; Ana Usano; Torsten B Rasmussen; Caroline B Jones; Toru Kubo; Jens Mogensen; Zdenka Reinhardt; Elena Cervi; Perry M Elliott; Rumana Z Omar; Juan P Kaski Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 7.804