Literature DB >> 18490111

Recent advances and current controversies in the management of DCIS of the breast.

George H Sakorafas1, David R Farley, George Peros.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is commonly diagnosed today, mainly due to widespread use of screening mammography. Despite a better understanding of its biological behavior, many issues regarding its optimal management remain controversial. The biological behavior of DCIS has been associated with distinct molecular and histological features (such as expression of COX2, Ki67, c-erbB2, p53 mutation, presence or absence of comedonecrosis, nuclear grade, hormone receptor status, etc.). Recent advances in the diagnosis of DCIS include using magnetic resonance imaging, and the use of stereotactic-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy (DVAB). Ductoscopy and ductal lavage have a limited role in the management of DCIS. Surgical treatment of DCIS includes simple local excision to various forms of wider excision (segmental resection or quadrantectomy), or even mastectomy (either simple or skin-sparing). Radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery significantly reduces local recurrence rates. Axillary lymph node dissection is not required for the management of DCIS; however, during the last decade, sentinel lymph node biopsy is increasingly used to exclude the presence of axillary metastases (when invasive disease is present within the DCIS). This approach has many advantages (including the avoidance of a second surgery if invasive disease is diagnosed within the DCIS) and should be considered when there is an increased probability for the presence of invasive breast cancer within the DCIS. The role of other minimally invasive methods (such as the "therapeutic" application of the DVAB technique, radiofrequency ablation, laser therapy, cryotherapy and brachytherapy) in the management of small DCIS remains unproven. Tamoxifen should be considered in the management of selected patients with DCIS, such as patients with hormone receptor positive DCIS, young patients, and patients without risk factors for potential side effects. Additionally, and controversial, there is evidence that aromatase inhibitors may be better than tamoxifen in the management of DCIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18490111     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  18 in total

1.  MRI of the breast in patients with DCIS to exclude the presence of invasive disease.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; Jincey D Sriram; Hendrik J Teertstra; Claudette E Loo; Jelle Wesseling; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Association of RB/p16-pathway perturbations with DCIS recurrence: dependence on tumor versus tissue microenvironment.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Dayana B Rivadeneira; Adam Ertel; Jessica Kline; Terry Hyslop; Gordon F Schwartz; Paolo Fortina; Erik S Knudsen
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Update on DCIS outcomes from the American Society of Breast Surgeons accelerated partial breast irradiation registry trial.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Henry M Kuerer; Peter D Beitsch; Frank A Vicini; Martin Keisch
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Comparative analysis of loss of heterozygosity and expression profile in normal tissue, DCIS and invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Michal Zikan; Jan Bohm; David Pavlista; David Cibula
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Choices in surgery for older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Vikram Swaminathan; Markos K Spiliopoulos; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Increased SIAH expression predicts ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) progression to invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathryn C Behling; Amy Tang; Boris Freydin; Inna Chervoneva; Sameep Kadakia; Gordon F Schwartz; Hallgeir Rui; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Lobular and ductal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  F A Tavassoli
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  A potential role for human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4 promoter single nucleotide polymorphisms in the pharmacogenomics of tamoxifen and its derivatives.

Authors:  Aleksandra K Greer; Centdrika R Dates; Athena Starlard-Davenport; Vineetha K Edavana; Stacie M Bratton; Ishwori B Dhakal; Moshe Finel; Susan A Kadlubar; Anna Radominska-Pandya
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  The significance of dual-mode elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions by physicians with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Sijing Huang; Xiuqin Ye; Keen Yang; Hongtian Tian; Zhimin Ding; Jing Chen; Jinfeng Xu; Fajin Dong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

10.  RNA-Seq of human breast ductal carcinoma in situ models reveals aldehyde dehydrogenase isoform 5A1 as a novel potential target.

Authors:  Hitchintan Kaur; Shihong Mao; Quanwen Li; Mansoureh Sameni; Stephen A Krawetz; Bonnie F Sloane; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.