Literature DB >> 18490093

The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.

Anthony R Scialli1.   

Abstract

The European Union's REACH regulation has explicit requirements for reproductive and developmental toxicity data on all substances manufactured in or imported into the European Union at > or = 10 metric tons/year. Meeting the data requirements with whole-animal testing could result in the use of almost 22 million vertebrate animals for the registration of existing chemicals and cost up to several hundred thousand dollars per registered substance. The requirement for financial and animal resources can be reduced by the use of in vitro testing, quantitative structure-activity relationship models, and grouping of related substances. Although REACH strongly encourages these methods of avoiding vertebrate animal testing, it does not appear that in vitro testing or quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis will be able to replace whole-animal reproductive and developmental toxicity testing. Grouping of related compounds offers the possibility, perhaps in conjunction with in vitro testing and structure-activity analysis, of reducing vertebrate animal testing provided there is sufficient information on the related compounds and sufficient reason to believe that the related compounds will have similar toxicological properties. The designation of a substance as a reproductive or developmental toxicant follows criteria that do not consider the dose level of the substance at which reproductive or developmental effects occur, as long as excessive generalized toxicity does not occur. This method of labeling substances without consideration of effective dose level does not provide information on the actual risk of the chemical. Designation of a substance as a reproductive or developmental toxicant may have important implications under REACH and can be expected to result in the need to obtain authorization for marketing of the substance in the European Union.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18490093     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of toxicogenomic responses to phthalate ester exposure in an organotypic testis co-culture model and responses observed in vivo.

Authors:  Sean Harris; Sanne A B Hermsen; Xiaozhong Yu; Sung Woo Hong; Elaine M Faustman
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  The presence of macrophages and inflammatory responses in an in vitro testicular co-culture model of male reproductive development enhance relevance to in vivo conditions.

Authors:  Sean Harris; Sara Pacheco Shubin; Susanna Wegner; Kirk Van Ness; Foad Green; Sung Woo Hong; Elaine M Faustman
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  A chemical-biological similarity-based grouping of complex substances as a prototype approach for evaluating chemical alternatives.

Authors:  Fabian A Grimm; Yasuhiro Iwata; Oksana Sirenko; Grace A Chappell; Fred A Wright; David M Reif; John Braisted; David L Gerhold; Joanne M Yeakley; Peter Shepard; Bruce Seligmann; Tim Roy; Peter J Boogaard; Hans B Ketelslegers; Arlean M Rohde; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Green Chem       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 10.182

4.  Toxicology in the fast lane: application of high-throughput bioassays to detect modulation of key enzymes and receptors.

Authors:  Christophe Morisseau; Oleg Merzlikin; Amy Lin; Guochun He; Wei Feng; Isela Padilla; Michael S Denison; Isaac N Pessah; Bruce D Hammock
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Diffusion of small molecules into medaka embryos improved by electroporation.

Authors:  Gerlinde Jung; Markus Hug; Christian Halter; Andrea Friesenhengst; Johann Walzer; Thomas Czerny
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.563

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.