Literature DB >> 18489964

Hemispheric differences in processing the literal interpretation of idioms: converging evidence from behavioral and fMRI studies.

Nira Mashal1, Miriam Faust, Talma Hendler, Mark Jung-Beeman.   

Abstract

The present study examined the role of the left (LH) and right (RH) cerebral hemispheres in processing alternative meanings of idiomatic sentences. We conducted two experiments using ambiguous idioms with plausible literal interpretations as stimuli. In the first experiment we tested hemispheric differences in accessing either the literal or the idiomatic meaning of idioms for targets presented to either the left or the right visual field. In the second experiment, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to define regional brain activation patterns in healthy adults processing either the idiomatic meaning of idioms or the literal meanings of either idioms or literal sentences. According to the Graded Salience Hypothesis (GSH, Giora, 2003), a selective RH involvement in the processing of nonsalient meanings, such as literal interpretations of idiomatic expressions, was expected. Results of the two experiments were consistent with the GSH predictions and show that literal interpretations of idioms are accessed faster than their idiomatic meanings in the RH. The fMRI data showed that processing the idiomatic interpretation of idioms and the literal interpretations of literal sentences involved LH regions whereas processing the literal interpretation of idioms was associated with increased activity in right brain regions including the right precuneus, right middle frontal gyrus (MFG), right posterior middle temporal gyrus (MTG), and right anterior superior temporal gyrus (STG). We suggest that these RH areas are involved in semantic ambiguity resolution and in processing nonsalient meanings of conventional idiomatic expressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18489964     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  18 in total

1.  Comprehension of Idioms in Turkish Aphasic Participants.

Authors:  Burcu Aydin; Muzaffer Barin; Oktay Yagiz
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-12

2.  Functional anatomy of idiomatic expressions.

Authors:  Bendersky Mariana; Lomlomdjian Carolina; Abusamra Valeria; Elizalde Acevedo Bautista; Kochen Silvia; Alba-Ferrara Lucía
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres? Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm.

Authors:  Anna B Cieślicka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-12

4.  The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Jie Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.

Authors:  Ross Metusalem; Marta Kutas; Thomas P Urbach; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Hemispheric Processing of Idioms and Irony in Adults With and Without Pervasive Developmental Disorder.

Authors:  Ronit Saban-Bezalel; Nira Mashal
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-11

7.  Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning.

Authors:  Jeremy I Skipper; Sarah Aliko; Stephen Brown; Yoon Ju Jo; Serena Lo; Emilia Molimpakis; Daniel R Lametti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.861

8.  The role of left and right hemispheres in the comprehension of idiomatic language: an electrical neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Nicola Crotti; Alberto Zani; Roberta Adorni
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Hemispheric differences in the organization of memory for text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Dynamic neural network of insight: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on solving Chinese 'chengyu' riddles.

Authors:  Qingbai Zhao; Zhijin Zhou; Haibo Xu; Shi Chen; Fang Xu; Wenliang Fan; Lei Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.