Literature DB >> 18489717

Incipient sexual isolation among cosmopolitan Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Roman Yukilevich1, John R True.   

Abstract

Understanding the biological conditions and the genetic basis of early stages of sexual isolation and speciation is an outstanding question in evolutionary biology. It is unclear how much genetic and phenotypic variation for mating preferences and their phenotypic cues is segregating within widespread and human-commensal species in nature. A recent case of incipient sexual isolation between Zimbabwe and cosmopolitan populations of the human-commensal fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster indicates that such species may initiate the process of sexual isolation. However, it is still unknown whether other geographical populations have undergone evolution of mating preferences. In this study we present new data on multiple-choice mating tests revealing partial sexual isolation between the United States and Caribbean populations. We relate our findings to African populations, showing that Caribbean flies are partially sexually isolated from Zimbabwe flies, but mate randomly with West African flies, which also show partial sexual isolation from the United States and Zimbabwe flies. Thus, Caribbean and West African populations seem to exhibit distinct mating preferences relative to populations in the United States and in Zimbabwe. These results suggest that widespread and human-commensal species may harbor different types of mating preferences across their geographical ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18489717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  19 in total

1.  X-autosome incompatibilities in Drosophila melanogaster: tests of Haldane's rule and geographic patterns within species.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; John R True
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth Narayan Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Translational Geroscience: From invertebrate models to companion animal and human interventions.

Authors:  Mitchell B Lee; Matt Kaeberlein
Journal:  Transl Med Aging       Date:  2018-08-17

4.  Effect of chromosome arrangements on mate recognition system leading to behavioral isolation in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Origin of sexual isolation in Drosophila ananassae due to founder effects.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 6.  Moving Speciation Genetics Forward: Modern Techniques Build on Foundational Studies in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Patterns and processes of genome-wide divergence between North American and African Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Roman Yukilevich; Thomas L Turner; Fumio Aoki; Sergey V Nuzhdin; John R True
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Whole-genome sequencing of two North American Drosophila melanogaster populations reveals genetic differentiation and positive selection.

Authors:  D Campo; K Lehmann; C Fjeldsted; T Souaiaia; J Kao; S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Cuticular Hydrocarbon Content that Affects Male Mate Preference of Drosophila melanogaster from West Africa.

Authors:  Aya Takahashi; Nao Fujiwara-Tsujii; Ryohei Yamaoka; Masanobu Itoh; Mamiko Ozaki; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-28

10.  Genetic diversity, population structure and Wolbachia infection status in a worldwide sample of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations.

Authors:  Rudi L Verspoor; Penelope R Haddrill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.