Literature DB >> 18489701

The hospital appropriateness evaluation protocol in elderly patients: a technique to evaluate admission and hospital stay.

Sergio Sánchez-García1, Teresa Juárez-Cedillo, Joaquín Federico Mould-Quevedo, José Juan García-González, Iris Contreras-Hernández, Maria Claudia Espinel-Bermudez, Dulce María Hernández-Hernández, Juan Garduño-Espinosa, Carmen García-Peña.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aging of the population represents one of the main challenges for health systems because of the increase in the demand for hospital services. To be able to count on tools that allow an objective evaluation of hospital-resource use becomes indispensable for health systems.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) regarding the appropriateness of admissions and hospital stays in elderly patients. In a scenario of scarce resources, to have a valid instrument will make it possible to evaluate the process of care in our growing elderly population in a standardized way.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of 144 randomly chosen elderly patients admitted to the hospital with 394 even-numbered hospital-stay days. For the reliability analysis between the pair of nurses with the AEP and the pair of specialists, the details of the hospital admissions and the stay days were obtained from the clinical files. Criteria validity was conducted by pairs of physicians, including two internists, two general surgeons and two geriatricians. Only the agreements were compared with agreements of the AEP-trained nurses. Disagreements were excluded from the final analysis.
RESULTS: Inter-rater (inter-reviewer) agreement of hospital admissions and days spent by the patient presented a kappa coefficient of >0.70, while these admissions and hospital-stay days was >0.70. Sensitivity and positive predictor value to detect inappropriate admissions were not calculated because no agreement existed on inappropriate admissions. Specificity and negative predictive value to detect appropriate admission was >94.0% and >98.0%. Sensitivity and positive predictor value to detect inappropriate hospital-stay days was >44.0% and >10.0%, while specificity and negative predictor value for detecting appropriate hospital-stay days was >79.0% and >88.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: AEP's high-reliability and moderate-validity results with regard to clinical judgement positions it as a useful instrument for appropriate hospitalization screening in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18489701     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00528.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  5 in total

1.  Developing of the appropriateness evaluation protocol for public hospitals in iran.

Authors:  Anvar Esmaili; Hamid Ravaghi; Hesam Seyedin; Bahram Delgoshaei; Masoud Salehi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 0.611

2.  Determinants of inappropriate admission of elderly people in county-level hospitals: a cross-sectional study in rural China.

Authors:  Xiaomei Hu; Hongxia Gao; Yan Zhang; Haomiao Li; Dai Su; Jingjing Chang; Di Jiang; Shihan Lei; Yingchun Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Direct costs associated with the appropriateness of hospital stay in elderly population.

Authors:  Joaquín F Mould-Quevedo; Carmen García-Peña; Iris Contreras-Hernández; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; Claudia Espinel-Bermúdez; Gabriela Morales-Cisneros; Sergio Sánchez-García
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Reliability and Validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for Public Hospitals in Korea.

Authors:  Clara Lee; Stella Jung-Hyun Kim; Changwoo Lee; Euichul Shin
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2019-09-12

5.  Health Care Personnel's Perspective on Potential Electronic Health Interventions to Prevent Hospitalizations for Older Persons Receiving Community Care: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Martha Therese Gjestsen; Siri Wiig; Ingelin Testad
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.