BACKGROUND: Contacts of patients with active tuberculosis ("TB contacts") with a tuberculin skin test (TST) size > or = 5 mm are currently recommended treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI). Knowing the cost-effectiveness of LTBI therapy for specific TB contact subpopulations may improve the use of limited resources by reducing the treatment of persons at low TB risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI therapy for different TB contact populations defined by important risk factors, and to propose an optimal policy based on different recommendation for each subgroup of contacts. METHODS: A 6-year Markov decision analytic model simulating the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), number of active TB cases prevented, and costs for hypothetical cohorts of Canadian TB contacts defined by TST size, age group (< 10 y/o or above), ethnicity, closeness of contact, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination status. RESULTS: For the majority of subgroups, the current policy of preventive therapy in those with positive TST was the most cost-effective. Nevertheless, our analysis determined that LTBI treatment is not cost-effective in nonhousehold Canadian-born (nonaboriginal) or foreign-born contacts age > or = 10 y/o. On the other hand, empirical treatment without screening of all non-BCG-vaccinated household contacts age < 10 y/o appeared cost-effective. Such an optimal approach would result in an incremental net monetary benefit of $25 for each contact investigated for a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY. Results were robust to several alternative assumptions considered in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The current practice of LTBI treatment for TB contacts with a TST size > or = 5 mm is cost-effective. A customized approach based on excluding low risk groups from screening and providing treatment to high risk contacts without screening could improve the performance of the program.
BACKGROUND: Contacts of patients with active tuberculosis ("TB contacts") with a tuberculin skin test (TST) size > or = 5 mm are currently recommended treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI). Knowing the cost-effectiveness of LTBI therapy for specific TB contact subpopulations may improve the use of limited resources by reducing the treatment of persons at low TB risk. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LTBI therapy for different TB contact populations defined by important risk factors, and to propose an optimal policy based on different recommendation for each subgroup of contacts. METHODS: A 6-year Markov decision analytic model simulating the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), number of active TB cases prevented, and costs for hypothetical cohorts of Canadian TB contacts defined by TST size, age group (< 10 y/o or above), ethnicity, closeness of contact, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination status. RESULTS: For the majority of subgroups, the current policy of preventive therapy in those with positive TST was the most cost-effective. Nevertheless, our analysis determined that LTBI treatment is not cost-effective in nonhousehold Canadian-born (nonaboriginal) or foreign-born contacts age > or = 10 y/o. On the other hand, empirical treatment without screening of all non-BCG-vaccinated household contacts age < 10 y/o appeared cost-effective. Such an optimal approach would result in an incremental net monetary benefit of $25 for each contact investigated for a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY. Results were robust to several alternative assumptions considered in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The current practice of LTBI treatment for TB contacts with a TST size > or = 5 mm is cost-effective. A customized approach based on excluding low risk groups from screening and providing treatment to high risk contacts without screening could improve the performance of the program.
Authors: Jonathon R Campbell; James C Johnston; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Victoria J Cook; R Kevin Elwood; Fawziah Marra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jonathon R Campbell; James C Johnston; Victoria J Cook; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; R Kevin Elwood; Fawziah Marra Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: H Alsdurf; O Oxlade; M Adjobimey; F Ahmad Khan; M Bastos; N Bedingfield; A Benedetti; D Boafo; T N Buu; L Chiang; V Cook; D Fisher; G J Fox; F Fregonese; P Hadisoemarto; J C Johnston; F Kassa; R Long; S Moayedi Nia; T A Nguyen; J Obeng; C Paulsen; K Romanowski; R Ruslami; K Schwartzman; H Sohn; E Strumpf; A Trajman; C Valiquette; L Yaha; D Menzies Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anik R Patel; Jonathon R Campbell; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Fawziah Marra; James C Johnston; Kirsten Smillie; Richard T Lester Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 2.692