Literature DB >> 18489238

Great apes' (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience.

Esther Herrmann1, Victoria Wobber, Josep Call.   

Abstract

Primates' understanding of tool functionality has been investigated extensively using a paradigm in which subjects are presented with a tool that they must use to obtain an out-of-reach reward. After being given experience on an initial problem, monkeys can transfer their skill to tools of different shapes while ignoring irrelevant tool changes (e.g., color). In contrast, monkeys without initial training perform poorly on the same tasks. Compared to most monkeys, great apes show a clear propensity for tool using and may not require as much experience to succeed on tool functionality tasks. We investigated this question by presenting 171 apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) with several tool-use problems without giving them initial training or familiarizing them with the test materials. Apes succeeded without experience, but only on problems based on basic properties such as the reward being supported by an object. However, only minimal experience was sufficient to allow them to quickly improve their performance on more complex problems in which the reward was not in contact with the tool. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18489238     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  17 in total

1.  Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks.

Authors:  Christopher D Bird; Nathan J Emery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Kea (Nestor notabilis) consider spatial relationships between objects in the support problem.

Authors:  Alice M I Auersperg; Gyula K Gajdon; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  'Captivity bias' in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology.

Authors:  Michael Haslam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Dogs are able to solve a means-end task.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Marleen Hentrup; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  A review of research in primate sanctuaries.

Authors:  Stephen R Ross; Jesse G Leinwand
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Differences in the cognitive skills of bonobos and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Brian Hare; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Autonomy in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Tom L Beauchamp; Victoria Wobber
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2014-04

9.  Abstract knowledge in the broken-string problem: evidence from nonhuman primates and pre-schoolers.

Authors:  Carolina Mayer; Josep Call; Anna Albiach-Serrano; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Gloria Sabbatini; Amanda Seed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A modular mind? A test using individual data from seven primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Bradley Barney; Valen E Johnson; Josep Call; Filippo Aureli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.