Literature DB >> 18487650

Factors associated with occurrence and recovery of nonambulatory dairy cows in the United States.

A L Green1, J E Lombard, L P Garber, B A Wagner, G W Hill.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to compare characteristics of US dairy operations that had one or more nonambulatory cows (unable to rise for any period of time) (cases) with operations that had no nonambulatory cows (controls) during 2004. A secondary objective was to describe factors associated with recovery of the last nonambulatory cow on the operation during 2004. Case dairy operations (n = 1,822) more often fed a total mixed ration [odds ratio (OR) = 2.0; confidence interval (CI): 1.1-3.4], produced more than 9,090 kg of milk (OR = 2.8; CI: 1.8-4.5), and were more likely to be of medium to large herd size (100 or more head of adult cows, OR = 3.7; CI: 2.2-6.2) compared with control dairies (n = 151). Compared with operations where the predominant flooring surface on which lactating cows stood or walked in winter was pasture, operations where pasture was not the predominant surface were at increased risk of having nonambulatory cows (OR = 4.7; CI: 2.2-10.2). Cows nonambulatory for less than 24 h were more likely to recover compared with cows nonambulatory for 24 h or more (OR = 3.0; CI: 2.0-4.4). Cows that received calcium, phosphorus, or potassium while non-ambulatory were more likely to recover (OR = 3.6; CI: 2.1-6.1) than cattle that did not receive these treatments. Cattle that were not repositioned periodically were more likely to recover (OR = 2.1; CI: 1.4-3.1), as were cattle that were not treated by a veterinarian before becoming nonambulatory (OR = 1.9; CI: 1.1-3.3). These findings are consistent with prolonged recumbency and prior history of health issues, respectively. Nonambulatory cattle with hypocalcemia were more likely to recover (OR = 6.0; CI: 3.4-10.7) compared with nonambulatory cows with all other causes of a nonambulatory condition (analyzed collectively as a single variable but including cancer, clinical mastitis, digestive conditions, metabolic imbalances, neurological problems, respiratory disease, other, unknown). The results of this study reveal that the majority of US dairy operations have at least one nonambulatory dairy cow over the course of a year. Additionally, individual animal factors associated with being nonambulatory may lead to improved identification and treatment of animals that are nonambulatory for a prolonged period. From the perspective of recovery, considering euthanasia is appropriate for cows that have been nonambulatory for more than 24 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18487650     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin I and L-Lactate in Blood of Dairy Cows Affected by Downer Cow Syndrome.

Authors:  J Labonté; J Dubuc; J-P Roy; S Buczinski
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  A comparison of a novel time-based summary measure of dairy cow health against cumulative disease frequency.

Authors:  Craig S McConnel; Ashleigh A McNeil; Joleen C Hadrich; Jason E Lombard; Jane Heller; Franklyn B Garry
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.146

3.  Assessment of the Farm Management of Culling Cattle: A Survey of Existing Practices and Suggestions for Drafting of Best Practices.

Authors:  Alessandro Russo Frattasi; Lorenzo Cesano; Michelangelo Botta; Daniele Pattono
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2014-05-20

4.  Determination of Dairy Cattle Euthanasia Criteria and Analysis of Barriers to Humane Euthanasia in the United States: Dairy Producer Surveys and Focus Groups.

Authors:  Brooklyn K Wagner; Mary Caitlin Cramer; Heather N Fowler; Hannah L Varnell; Alia M Dietsch; Kathryn L Proudfoot; Jan Shearer; Maria Correa; Monique D Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Survival associated with cerebrospinal fluid analysis in downer adult dairy cows: A retrospective study (2006-2014).

Authors:  Marie-Ève Bilodeau; Damien Achard; David Francoz; Carolyn Grimes; André Desrochers; Sylvain Nichols; Marie Babkine; Gilles Fecteau
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

7.  Dairy Cattle Euthanasia-Focus Groups Exploring the Perspectives of Brazilians Working in the Dairy Cattle Industry.

Authors:  Victoria R Merenda; Eduardo B de Oliveira; Heather N Fowler; Monique D Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Timely Euthanasia in the United States Dairy Industry-Challenges and a Path Forward.

Authors:  Jennifer B Walker; I Noa Roman-Muniz; Lily N Edwards-Callaway
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.