Literature DB >> 18487042

Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers.

Walter Mulbry1, Shannon Kondrad, Carolina Pizarro, Elizabeth Kebede-Westhead.   

Abstract

Cultivating algae on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in animal manure effluents presents an alternative to the current practice of land application. The objective of this study was to determine values for productivity, nutrient content, and nutrient recovery using filamentous green algae grown in outdoor raceways at different loading rates of raw and anaerobically digested dairy manure effluent. Algal turf scrubber raceways (30m2 each) were operated in central Maryland for approximately 270 days each year (roughly April 1-December 31) from 2003 to 2006. Algal biomass was harvested every 4-12 days from the raceways after daily additions of manure effluent corresponding to loading rates of 0.3 to 2.5g total N (TN) and 0.08 to 0.42g total P (TP) m(-2)d(-1). Mean algal productivity values increased from approximately 2.5g DW m(-2)d(-1) at the lowest loading rate (0.3g TN m(-2)d(-1)) to 25g DW m(-2)d(-1) at the highest loading rate (2.5g TN m(-2)d(-1)). Mean N and P contents in the dried biomass increased 1.5-2.0-fold with increasing loading rate up to maximums of 7% N and 1% P (dry weight basis). Although variable, algal N and P accounted for roughly 70-90% of input N and P at loading rates below 1g TN, 0.15g TP m(-2)d(-1). N and P recovery rates decreased to 50-80% at higher loading rates. There were no significant differences in algal productivity, algal N and P content, or N and P recovery values from raceways with carbon dioxide supplementation compared to values from raceways without added carbon dioxide. Projected annual operational costs are very high on a per animal basis ($780 per cow). However, within the context of reducing nutrient inputs in sensitive watersheds such as the Chesapeake Bay, projected operational costs of $11 per kgN are well below the costs cited for upgrading existing water treatment plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18487042     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  24 in total

1.  Waste utilization and biodiesel production by the green microalga Scenedesmus obliquus.

Authors:  Shovon Mandal; Nirupama Mallick
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Algae turf scrubber and vertical constructed wetlands combined system for decentralized secondary wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Gleison de Souza Celente; Gustavo Stolzenberg Colares; Ênio Leandro Machado; Eduardo Alexis Lobo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Integration of microalgal cultivation system for wastewater remediation and sustainable biomass production.

Authors:  Prabuddha L Gupta; Seung-Mok Lee; Hee-Jeong Choi
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Mitigating the global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms: Moving targets in a human- and climatically-altered world.

Authors:  Hans W Paerl; Malcolm A Barnard
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.273

Review 5.  Pharmaceuticals in the Aquatic Environment: A Review on Eco-Toxicology and the Remediation Potential of Algae.

Authors:  Monika Hejna; Dominika Kapuścińska; Anna Aksmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Recent Advancements in Cyclodextrin-Based Adsorbents for the Removal of Hazardous Pollutants from Waters.

Authors:  Shan E Zehra Syeda; Dominika Nowacka; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Anna Maria Skwierawska
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 7.  Placing microalgae on the biofuels priority list: a review of the technological challenges.

Authors:  H C Greenwell; L M L Laurens; R J Shields; R W Lovitt; K J Flynn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A new approach to enhance the conventional two-phase anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge.

Authors:  Mohammad Aminzadeh; Mohammad Javad Bardi; Hassan Aminirad
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-01-07

9.  Coupling of Microalgae Cultivation with Anaerobic Digestion of Poultry Wastes: Toward Sustainable Value Added Bioproducts.

Authors:  Rajinikanth Rajagopal; Seyyed Ebrahim Mousavi; Bernard Goyette; Suman Adhikary
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Selecting reliable and robust freshwater macroalgae for biomass applications.

Authors:  Rebecca J Lawton; Rocky de Nys; Nicholas A Paul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.