Literature DB >> 18486452

Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature.

E Nout1, L L M Cesteleyn, K G H van der Wal, L N A van Adrichem, I M J Mathijssen, E B Wolvius.   

Abstract

Since its introduction in about 1950, the Le Fort III (LF III) procedure has become a widely accepted treatment for correction of midface hypoplasia and related functional and esthetic problems. As long-term surgical experience grows and improvements are made in technique, equipment and peri-operative care, the number of LF III procedures performed worldwide is increasing. A number of fundamental questions concerning the technique remain unclear, and large, conclusive studies are lacking owing to the relative rarity of severe midface hypoplasia. This literature review aims to address problems, such as the indication field, timing of surgery, rate of relapse and the use of distraction osteogenesis. An overview of the history and technique of LF III osteotomy and distraction is provided, together with a comprehensive review of the available clinical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18486452     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  10 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Regenerate healing outcomes in unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using quantitative histomorphometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Schwarz; Krikor G Arman; Mehreen S Kakwan; Ameen M Jamali; Ayman A Elmeligy; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

5.  Bilateral squamosal suture synostosis: A rare form of isolated craniosynostosis in Crouzon syndrome.

Authors:  Yasmeen K Tandon; Michael Rubin; Mohamed Kahlifa; Gaby Doumit; Lena Naffaa
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

6.  Loss of reflex tearing after maxillary orthognathic surgery: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Sunah Kang; Sun Young Jang; Areum Lee; Jae Woo Jang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew A Heggie; Ricky Kumar; Jocelyn M Shand
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01

8.  Bilateral meningoencephaloceles with cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after facial advancement in the Crouzon syndrome.

Authors:  Bharat A Panuganti; Matthew Leach; Jastin Antisdel
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01

Review 9.  Craniosynostosis in Growing Children : Pathophysiological Changes and Neurosurgical Problems.

Authors:  Jung Won Choi; So Young Lim; Hyung-Jin Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10

10.  Crouzon syndrome: Virtual planning of surgical treatment by application of internal distractors.

Authors:  Chingiz Rahimov; Ruslan Asadov; Gunel Hajiyeva; Nazim Verdiyev; Zaur Novruzov; Ismayil Farzaliyev
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.