Literature DB >> 18486215

Screening for narrow angles in the singapore population: evaluation of new noncontact screening methods.

Raghavan Lavanya1, Paul J Foster, Lisandro M Sakata, David S Friedman, Kenji Kashiwagi, Tien-Yin Wong, Han T Aung, Tamuno Alfred, Hong Gao, Adrian G Ee, Steve K Seah, Tin Aung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the screening effectiveness of 3 new noncontact devices, the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer (SPAC) (Takagi, Nagano, Japan), which measures peripheral anterior chamber depth (ACD); IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which measures central ACD; and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Visante, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), which images the angles, and to compare these instruments with gonioscopy in identifying people with narrow angles (NAs).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational, community-based study. PARTICIPANTS: Phakic subjects aged >or=50 years without ophthalmic symptoms who were recruited from a community polyclinic in Singapore.
METHODS: All subjects underwent examination with SPAC, IOLMaster, and AS-OCT in the dark by a single operator. Gonioscopy was performed by an ophthalmologist masked to the instruments' findings. The area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was generated to assess the performance of these tests in detecting people with a NA in either eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eyes were classified as having NAs by gonioscopy if the posterior pigmented trabecular meshwork could be seen for <or=2 quadrants of the angle circumference with or without peripheral anterior synechiae.
RESULTS: A total of 2052 subjects were examined and underwent all 3 tests. The prevalence of a NA in at least 1 eye diagnosed by gonioscopy was 20.4% (422 subjects). The AUC for the SPAC using a numeric grade <5 as a cutoff was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.85), with a sensitivity of 90.0% (95% CI, 86.8-92.7) and a specificity of 76.6% (95% CI, 74.4-78.6). The AUC for the IOLMaster at an ACD cutoff of <2.87 mm was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81-0.85), with a sensitivity of 87.7% (95% CI, 84.2-90.7) and a specificity of 77.7% (95% CI, 75.6-79.7). The AUC for the AS-OCT was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74-0.78), with a sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI, 84.9-91.3) and a specificity of 62.9% (95% CI, 60.5-65.2).
CONCLUSIONS: The low specificity found with the SPAC, IOLMaster, and AS-OCT may limit the usefulness of these devices in screening for NAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18486215     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the anterior ocular segment measurements using swept-source optical coherent tomography and a scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer.

Authors:  Toshie Furuya; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Tatsuya Chiba; Satoshi Kogure; Shigeo Tsukahara; Kenji Kashiwagi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Five-year incidence of angle closure among glaucoma health examination participants.

Authors:  Kenji Kashiwagi; Tatsuya Chiba; Fumihiko Mabuchi; Toshie Furuya; Shigeo Tsukahara
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Anterior segment parameters in Indian young adults using the Pentacam.

Authors:  Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini; Fereshteh Abolbashari; Norhani Mohidin
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Characterizing Current Attitudes and Practices for Human Subject Safety in Studies Involving Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Jacob Szpernal; Joseph Carroll; Ryan Spellecy; Jane A Bachman Groth
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Comparing approaches to screening for angle closure in older Chinese adults.

Authors:  J Andrews; D S Chang; Y Jiang; M He; P J Foster; B Munoz; K Kashiwagi; D S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Anish Jindal; Irene Ctori; Gianni Virgili; Ersilia Lucenteforte; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Obtained From Swept-Source Fourier-Domain and Time-Domain Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Sunee Chansangpetch; Anwell Nguyen; Marta Mora; Mai Badr; Mingguang He; Travis C Porco; Shan C Lin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 8.  Recent advances in anterior chamber angle imaging.

Authors:  Natalia Porporato; Mani Baskaran; Rahat Husain; Tin Aung
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Effects of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure and anterior chamber depth.

Authors:  Xin-Quan Liu; Hua-Ying Zhu; Jing Su; Xiao-Jun Hao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Morphological analysis of age-related iridocorneal angle changes in normal and glaucomatous cases using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yuko Maruyama; Kazuhiko Mori; Yoko Ikeda; Morio Ueno; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.