Literature DB >> 18485957

Gastroschisis closure--does method really matter?

Robert L Weinsheimer1, Natalie L Yanchar, Sarah B Bouchard, Peter K Kim, Jean-Martin Laberge, Erik D Skarsgard, S K Lee, Douglas McMillan, Peter von Dadelszen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Management of gastroschisis varies. This study aims to determine which aspects of practice influence outcomes.
METHODS: All cases of simple gastroschisis (N = 99) in the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network database were analyzed looking at methods of preoperative bowel protection, timing of closure, and closure techniques; and outcome measures included time to onset of enteral feeds, duration of parenteral nutrition (PN), and length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: One third of infants had initial bowel protection using a spring-loaded silo, which was significantly associated with a delay (beyond 24 hours) in establishing primary closure. Neither preoperative bowel protection methods nor defect closure techniques conferred any significant effects on success at establishing primary closure or functional outcomes. After adjusting for all covariates, only failure to establish primary closure was associated with impaired outcomes with significantly delayed initiation of enteral feeds and prolonged LOS. Low birth weight (<2000 g) and younger gestational age (<36 weeks) were associated with a 3-fold increased risk of longer PN dependence and 5-fold risk of extended LOS, respectively. Babies undergoing the sutureless spontaneous closure technique had significant delays in initiating enteral feeds but no increased requirements for PN or LOS.
CONCLUSIONS: Modes of preoperative bowel protection and techniques of abdominal wall closure ultimately have no association with functional outcomes in infants with gastroschisis. Failure to establish primary closure, however, is significantly associated with delays in establishing intestinal function and subsequent time to discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18485957     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  8 in total

1.  Infectious complications in the management of gastroschisis.

Authors:  Robert Baird; Pramod Puligandla; Erik Skarsgard; Jean-Martin Laberge
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Review of the evidence on the closure of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Vincent E Mortellaro; Shawn D St Peter; Frankie B Fike; Saleem Islam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Contemporary trends in the use of primary repair for gastroschisis in surgical infants.

Authors:  Patrick M Chesley; Daniel J Ledbetter; John J Meehan; Assaf P Oron; Patrick J Javid
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Clinical features and practice patterns of gastroschisis: a retrospective analysis using a Japanese national inpatient database.

Authors:  Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga; Jun Fujishiro
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Gastroschisis: one year outcomes from national cohort study.

Authors:  Timothy J Bradnock; Sean Marven; Anthony Owen; Paul Johnson; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Patsy Spark; Elizabeth S Draper; Marian Knight
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-15

Review 6.  Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management.

Authors:  Benjamin S R Allin; Win Hou W Tse; Sean Marven; Paul R V Johnson; Marian Knight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment.

Authors:  Benjamin Allin; Andrew Ross; Sean Marven; Nigel J Hall; Marian Knight
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Umbilical hernia following gastroschisis closure: a common event?

Authors:  L G C Tullie; G M Bough; A Shalaby; E M Kiely; J I Curry; A Pierro; P De Coppi; K M K Cross
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 1.827

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.