Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo1, Maria Alvarez-Sauco2, Giacomo Koch3, Michele Franca4, Gonzalo Marquez5, Jose A Sanchez5, Rafael M Acero5, John C Rothwell6. 1. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Facultade de Ciencias do Deporte e a Educación Física, Learning and Motor Control Group, Universidad de A Coruña, Avd. Ernesto Che Guevara 121, Pazos-Liáns, 15179 Oleiros. A Coruña, Spain. Electronic address: mafo@udc.es. 2. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Sección de Neurología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain. 3. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Laboratorio di Neurologia Clinica e Comportamentale, Fondazione S. Lucia I.R.C.C.S. Rome, Italy. 4. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Neurological Sciences, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 5. Facultade de Ciencias do Deporte e a Educación Física, Learning and Motor Control Group, Universidad de A Coruña, Avd. Ernesto Che Guevara 121, Pazos-Liáns, 15179 Oleiros. A Coruña, Spain. 6. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several studies suggest that transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) can have a variety of effects on the central nervous system (CNS). In this study, we tried to replicate the physiological effects of TENS and to explore its effects on intracortical circuits. METHODS: We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and spinal reflex testing to examine excitability of intracortical and spinal cord circuits before and after a 30-min period of TENS over the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle. We measured the amplitude of TMS-evoked muscle responses (MEP), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF) and cortical antagonist inhibition (CAI) in flexor and extensor carpial radialis (FCR, ECR) muscles as well as spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI) and presynaptic inhibition (PI) from ECR to FCR. RESULTS: TENS had no significant effect on any of these measures apart from a reduction in median nerve induced facilitation of FCR when testing CAI. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with previous studies, our results suggest that the effects of TENS are highly variable and unreliable, likely by the difficulty in defining precise parameters of stimulation in individual subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Care should be taken in assuming that effects after TENS observed in small populations of subjects will apply equally to a wider population.
OBJECTIVE: Several studies suggest that transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) can have a variety of effects on the central nervous system (CNS). In this study, we tried to replicate the physiological effects of TENS and to explore its effects on intracortical circuits. METHODS: We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and spinal reflex testing to examine excitability of intracortical and spinal cord circuits before and after a 30-min period of TENS over the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle. We measured the amplitude of TMS-evoked muscle responses (MEP), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF) and cortical antagonist inhibition (CAI) in flexor and extensor carpial radialis (FCR, ECR) muscles as well as spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI) and presynaptic inhibition (PI) from ECR to FCR. RESULTS: TENS had no significant effect on any of these measures apart from a reduction in median nerve induced facilitation of FCR when testing CAI. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with previous studies, our results suggest that the effects of TENS are highly variable and unreliable, likely by the difficulty in defining precise parameters of stimulation in individual subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Care should be taken in assuming that effects after TENS observed in small populations of subjects will apply equally to a wider population.
Authors: Rebecca K Andrews; Siobhan M Schabrun; Michael C Ridding; Mary P Galea; Paul W Hodges; Lucinda S Chipchase Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Siobhan M Schabrun; Michael C Ridding; Mary P Galea; Paul W Hodges; Lucinda S Chipchase Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marco Antonio Cavalcanti Garcia; João Marcos Yamasaki Catunda; Marcio Nogueira de Souza; Ana Paula Fontana; Sandro Sperandei; Claudia D Vargas Journal: Neural Plast Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 3.599