Literature DB >> 18485170

The use of inferior vena caval filters prior to major surgery in women with gynaecological cancer.

T Adib1, A Belli, J McCall, T E J Ind, J E Bridges, J H Shepherd, D P J Barton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of inferior vena caval filters (IVCF) prior to surgery in women with gynaecological cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE).
DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical notes and electronic records.
SETTING: Gynaecological oncology cancer centre. POPULATION: Women with gynaecological cancer and VTE requiring major surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on women treated for gynaecological malignancies who had had VTE, and an IVCF placed before major abdominal surgery were reviewed during the period 1996-2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety of IVCF placement and retrieval, peri-operative morbidity and incidence of further VTE.
RESULTS: The median age was 66 years (range 30-84 years). Of the 39 women, 35 (90%) women had a primary cancer diagnosis and 4 (10%) had recurrent disease. Twenty-two women had ovarian cancer, 2 had borderline ovarian tumours, 9 had uterine cancer, 5 had cervical cancer and 1 woman had concurrent ovarian and endometrial cancers. The recurrent cancers were two cervical, one ovarian and one uterine. The IVCF used were either of the permanent or retrievable type, the latter being more commonly used in younger women. All filters were placed without morbidity, and none of these women who then underwent major abdominal surgery had VTE complications. In 43.6% of women (n = 17), surgery was performed within 6 weeks of the diagnosis of VTE. All women received perioperative anticoagulation in the form of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. Three retrievable filters were uneventfully removed postoperatively. No filter-related problems occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in women with gynaecological cancer and life-threatening VTE is feasible with preoperative IVCF placement. The use of IVCF was safe with no worsening of the VTE, and without surgical or filter-related problems. A short interval between the diagnosis of VTE and surgery was not associated with increased perioperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18485170     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01736.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  3 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of perioperative nonpermanent vena cava filter placement in patients with deep venous thrombosis or blood stasis of the vein.

Authors:  Kenji Ishihara; Shinichi Hiromatsu; Yusuke Shintani; Kurando Kanaya; Keita Mikasa; Shigeaki Aoyagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Risk factors for perioperative venous thromboembolism: A retrospective study in Japanese women with gynecologic diseases.

Authors:  Nao Suzuki; Norihito Yoshioka; Tatsuru Ohara; Noriyuki Yokomichi; Takafumi Nako; Namiko Yahagi; Suguru Igarashi; Yoichi Kobayashi; Misako Yoshimatsu; Kenji Takizawa; Yasuo Nakajima; Kazushige Kiguchi; Bunpei Ishizuka
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2010-11-07

3.  Three-year experience of prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filters in women with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Suresh B Babu; Asiya Maheen Khan; Philip Jb Coates
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-08-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.