Literature DB >> 18484892

Central and deep renal tumors can be effectively ablated: radiofrequency ablation outcomes with fiberoptic peripheral temperature monitoring.

Marshall S Wingo1, Raymond J Leveillee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The "overtreatment" of incidental renal lesions with nephrectomy and a desire to reduce patient morbidity and preserve renal function resulted in the development of nephron-sparing surgical alternatives. As clinical experience accumulates with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), confidence in the oncologic effectiveness of the management method increases. Although many investigators describe RFA management success in small-to medium-sized renal tumors, hesitation is expressed when managing endophytic, central, or hilar lesions. Using RFA combined with peripheral real-time temperature monitoring, we have improved the management success rate for endophytic or centrally located renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RFA was selected in small-to medium-sized (range 1.0-5.3 cm), solid, contrast-enhancing, renal masses. CT-RFA appropriate tumors were accessible percutaneously through the flank in a prone position in the CT gantry. Anterior tumors, in close proximity (2 cm) to an abdominal viscus or other vital structure, underwent laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (Lap-RFA). Fiberoptic temperature monitors (400 microm) were placed percutaneously 5 mm beyond the tumor periphery. Irrespective of lesion size, depth, or location, RFA treatments were continued until all peripheral sensors registered higher than 60 degrees C.
RESULTS: In 131 patients, 146 tumors were managed with RFA ablation at our institution; 41 (28%) tumors in 39 patients were classified as endophytic. The mean endophytic tumor size was 2.7 cm (range 1.0-5.0 cm). Mean follow-up was 29 months. Thirty-seven of 41 (90.2%) endophytic, hilar, or centrally located tumors were managed with a single RFA procedure. Two of four recurrences were managed with extirpative therapy. Two recurrences await repeat CT-RFA management.
CONCLUSIONS: RFA with peripheral fiberoptic temperature monitoring provides a definitive management end point. Inadequate coverage of the tumor volume is immediately recognized in real time, which allows necessary treatment adjustments to be made. "Enhanced" RFA with peripheral temperature monitoring resulted in an improved single treatment success rate and boosted operator confidence in the management of endophytic, central, or hilar renal tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484892     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

Review 1.  Results of radiofrequency kidney tumor ablation: renal function preservation and oncologic efficacy.

Authors:  Nelson Salas; Rajan Ramanathan; Scott Dummett; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Safety, efficacy and predictors of local recurrence after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Z Su; Fatima Memon; Howard M Lau; Andrew J Brooks; Manish I Patel; Henry H Woo; Simon V Bariol; Philip Vladica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Laparoscopic and image-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: patient selection and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott M Castle; Vladislav Gorbatiy; Obi Ekwenna; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of renal neoplasms after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation.

Authors:  Satomi Kawamoto; Stephen B Solomon; David A Bluemke; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 5.  Ablative therapies for small renal tumours.

Authors:  Arturo Castro; Lawrence C Jenkins; Nelson Salas; Gideon Lorber; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Review of the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal masses.

Authors:  Regina El Dib; Naji J Touma; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: four-year follow-up results in 47 patients.

Authors:  Soo Dong Kim; Seong Guk Yoon; Gyung Tak Sung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Radio-frequency ablation helps preserve nephrons in salvage of failed microwave ablation for a renal cancer in a solitary kidney.

Authors:  Scott M Castle; Nelson Salas; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-01

9.  Comparison of clinical outcome between pyeloperfused versus non-pyeloperfused microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Katayoun Samadi; Ronald Arellano
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.