Literature DB >> 18484834

Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception.

Steven M Thurman1, Emily D Grossman.   

Abstract

Humans are remarkably good at recognizing biological motion, even when depicted as point-light animations. There is currently some debate as to the relative importance of form and motion cues in the perception of biological motion from the simple dot displays. To investigate this issue, we adapted the "Bubbles" technique, most commonly used in face and object perception, to isolate the critical features for point-light biological motion perception. We find that observer sensitivity waxes and wanes during the course of an action, with peak discrimination performance most strongly correlated with moments of local opponent motion of the extremities. When dynamic cues are removed, instances that are most perceptually salient become the least salient, evidence that the strategies employed during point-light biological motion perception are not effective for recognizing human actions from static patterns. We conclude that local motion features, not global form templates, are most critical for perceiving point-light biological motion. These experiments also present a useful technique for identifying key features of dynamic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484834     DOI: 10.1167/8.3.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  A new technique for generating disordered point-light animations for the study of biological motion perception.

Authors:  Jejoong Kim; Eunice L Jung; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Minimal videos: Trade-off between spatial and temporal information in human and machine vision.

Authors:  Guy Ben-Yosef; Gabriel Kreiman; Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-04-20

3.  Reference repulsion in the categorical perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Steve Haroz; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting.

Authors:  Jinfu Shi; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-29

5.  fMR-Adaptation Reveals Invariant Coding of Biological Motion on the Human STS.

Authors:  Emily D Grossman; Nicole L Jardine; John A Pyles
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Unaffected perceptual thresholds for biological and non-biological form-from-motion perception in autism spectrum conditions.

Authors:  Ayse Pinar Saygin; Jennifer Cook; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function.

Authors:  S Gilaie-Dotan; S Bentin; M Harel; G Rees; A P Saygin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Signature movements lead to efficient search for threatening actions.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bayesian integration of position and orientation cues in perception of biological and non-biological forms.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Embodied learning of a generative neural model for biological motion perception and inference.

Authors:  Fabian Schrodt; Georg Layher; Heiko Neumann; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.