Literature DB >> 18484243

Good results with an uncemented proximally HA-coated stem in hip revision surgery: 62 hips followed for 2-13 years.

Mats F Salemyr1, Olof G Skoldenberg, Henrik G Boden, Torbjorn E Ahl, Per Y Adolphson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Proximal bone loss due to stress-shielding is a matter of concern after uncemented femoral hip revision. We have used short, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses in revision since 1989, and we now report the results.
METHODS: 60 patients (62 hips) were revised because of aseptic loosening. Bone defects prior to revision were mostly of type II according to the Gustilo-Pasternak and Endo-Klinik classifications. Follow-up time was 73 (24-161) months. 9 patients had died before follow-up; 8 of these still had the stem in place. Clinical assessment was performed with the Harris hip score. Radiographs were evaluated for bone defects at revision, postoperative stem fixation, and periprosthetic bone remodeling.
RESULTS: Mean Harris hip score was 75 (30-100) points. There was no stem loosening or progressive subsidence. 8 patients had mild to moderate thigh pain. Osteolysis, present at revision, had diminished, partially or completely, in four-fifths of the hips at follow-up. 4 hips had required re-revision due to fracture or dislocation. The 6-year prosthesis survival rate was 95% (95% CI: 0.83-0.98).
INTERPRETATION: Uncemented revision with a short, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis is a reliable procedure with encouraging results in the medium term if bone defects at revision are moderate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484243     DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  6 in total

1.  Case report: Cementless stem stabilization after intraoperative fracture: a radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  David Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G Nilsson; Stuart A Callary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M D Schofer; T Efe; T J Heyse; N Timmesfeld; R Velte; F Hinrichs; J Schmitt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of 14 patients by CT.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Fredrik Strömwall; Mats O Beckman; Karl A Hansson; André Stark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years.

Authors:  Per Y Adolphson; Mats O F Salemyr; Olof G Sköldenberg; Henrik S G Bodén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Downsizing in total hip arthroplasty. A short stem as a revision implant.

Authors:  Marcel Coutandin; Yama Afghanyar; Philipp Rehbein; Jens Dargel; Philipp Drees; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.