Literature DB >> 18482556

The current and future role of screening in the era of HPV vaccination.

Evan Myers1, Warner K Huh, Jason D Wright, Jennifer S Smith.   

Abstract

With the introduction of cervical screening programs, the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer has been drastically reduced. Techniques such as the traditional Papanicolaou test and the newer liquid-based cytology allow for the early detection of cervical abnormalities prior to the development of invasive cervical cancer. As oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is necessary for cervical cancer, HPV-DNA testing has also been proposed as a routine screening method for the general population. Screening limitations, such as adherence, test sensitivity and specificity, access, and cost-effectiveness are reflected in current screening guidelines. The development of prophylactic cervical cancer vaccines is a major milestone in cervical cancer prevention. These vaccines protect against the initial infection of certain oncogenic HPV types, and therefore prevent the development of cervical dysplasia, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer. Considering routine cervical cancer vaccination in adolescent girls, screening guidelines must adapt in order to retain efficient and cost-effective prevention measures. Although the true epidemiological and economic impact of cervical cancer vaccines cannot be immediately realized, mathematical models predict various scenarios in which vaccination, in addition to cervical screening, will be cost-effective and further reduce cervical cancer disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482556     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Cost and resource utilization in cervical cancer management: a real-world retrospective cost analysis.

Authors:  I Cromwell; Z Ferreira; L Smith; K van der Hoek; G Ogilvie; A Coldman; S J Peacock
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Variation in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake and Acceptability Between Female and Male Adolescents and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Kristin L Johnson; Meng-Yun Lin; Howard Cabral; Lewis E Kazis; Ingrid T Katz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  Economic evaluation of human papilloma virus vaccination in the European Union: a critical review.

Authors:  Daniela Koleva; Paola De Compadri; Anna Padula; Livio Garattini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Randomized clinical trial of imiquimod: an adjunct to treating cervical dysplasia.

Authors:  Deirdre R Pachman; Debra L Barton; Amy C Clayton; Renee M McGovern; John A Jefferies; Paul J Novotny; Jeff A Sloan; Charles L Loprinzi; Bobbie S Gostout
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Scaling up human papillomavirus vaccination: a conceptual framework of vaccine adherence.

Authors:  Ingrid T Katz; Norma C Ware; Glenda Gray; Jessica E Haberer; Claude A Mellins; David R Bangsberg
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Human papillomavirus-related gynecologic neoplasms: screening and prevention.

Authors:  Whitfield B Growdon; Marcela Del Carmen
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

7.  Physicians' intentions to change pap smear frequency following human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  K L Bruder; K L Downes; T L Malo; A R Giuliano; D A Salmon; S T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Value of high-risk human papillomavirus 16 deoxyribonucleic acid testing with cytological entities in peri and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Veena Kashyap; Suresh Hedau
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.