Literature DB >> 18482048

Sense of coherence and social support predict living liver donors' emotional stress prior to living-donor liver transplantation.

Yesim Erim1, Mingo Beckmann, Sylvia Kroencke, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Sefik Tagay, Camino Valentin-Gamazo, Massimo Malago, Andrea Frilling, Christoph E Broelsch, Wolfgang Senf.   

Abstract

The protection of the donors from physical or emotional harm has been a fundamental principle in living-donor liver donation from the beginning. Psychosomatic donor evaluation aims at the selection of eligible donors and the screening and exclusion of psychiatrically vulnerable donors. As clinical interviews may include subjective biases, efforts should be made to establish objective criteria for donor assessment. In recent research, protective factors have been reported to be a significant force behind healthy adjustment to life stresses and can be investigated as possible predictors of donors' eligibility. Being the central construct of Antonovsky's theory of salutogenesis, the sense of coherence is one of the most surveyed protective factors and a good predictor of individuals' stability when experiencing stress. Furthermore, family support has been shown to be a valuable protective resource in coping with stress. This study surveyed whether sense of coherence and social support predict donors' emotional strain prior to transplantation. Seventy-one donor candidates were included in the study during the donor evaluation prior to living-donor liver transplantation. Sense of coherence proved to be a significant predictor for all criterion variables, namely anxiety, depression and mental quality of life. In addition to this, donor candidates who were classified as eligible for donation in the psychosomatic interview had significantly higher values on sense of coherence total scores compared with rejected donors. In a multiple regression analysis, sense of coherence and social support together yielded a prediction of depression with an explained variance of 22% (R(2) = 0.22). Sense of coherence and social support can be implemented as self-rating instruments in the psychosomatic selection of donors and would help to further objectify donors' eligibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482048     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00782.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  8 in total

1.  [Psychosomatic aspects of living donor liver transplantation].

Authors:  Y Erim; M Beckmann; G Gerken; A Paul; W Senf; S Beckebaum
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Dew; A F DiMartini; A J DeVito Dabbs; A Zuckoff; H P Tan; M L McNulty; G E Switzer; K R Fox; J B Greenhouse; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Living donor liver transplantation in Europe.

Authors:  Silvio Nadalin; Ivan Capobianco; Fabrizio Panaro; Fabrizio Di Francesco; Roberto Troisi; Mauricio Sainz-Barriga; Paolo Muiesan; Alfred Königsrainer; Giuliano Testa
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

5.  Health-related quality of life of living liver donors 1 year after donation.

Authors:  Li-Chueh Weng; Hsiu-Li Huang; Wei-Chen Lee; Yu-Hsia Tsai; Woan-Shyuan Wang; Kang-Hua Chen
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Resilience and quality of life in 161 living kidney donors before nephrectomy and in the aftermath of donation: a naturalistic single center study.

Authors:  Yesim Erim; Yeliz Kahraman; Frank Vitinius; Mingo Beckmann; Sylvia Kröncke; Oliver Witzke
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Mental health status after living donor hepatectomy.

Authors:  Szu-Han Wang; Ping-Yi Lin; Jiun-Yi Wang; Mei-Feng Huang; Hui-Chuan Lin; Chia-En Hsieh; Ya-Lan Hsu; Yao-Li Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Predictors of decision ambivalence and the differences between actual living liver donors and potential living liver donors.

Authors:  Li-Chueh Weng; Hsiu-Li Huang; Hsiu-Hsin Tsai; Wei-Chen Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.