Literature DB >> 18481540

Apparent competition with an exotic plant reduces native plant establishment.

John L Orrock1, Martha S Witter, O J Reichman.   

Abstract

Biological invasions can change ecosystem function, have tremendous economic costs, and impact human health; understanding the forces that cause and maintain biological invasions is thus of immediate importance. A mechanism by which exotic plants might displace native plants is by increasing the pressure of native consumers on native plants, a form of indirect interaction termed "apparent competition." Using experimental exclosures, seed addition, and monitoring of small mammals in a California grassland, we examined whether exotic Brassica nigra increases the pressure of native consumers on a native bunchgrass, Nassella pulchra. Experimental plots were weeded to focus entirely on indirect effects via consumers. We demonstrate that B. nigra alters the activity of native small-mammal consumers, creating a gradient of consumption that dramatically reduces N. pulchra establishment. Previous work has shown that N. pulchra is a strong competitor, but that it is heavily seed limited. By demonstrating that consumer pressure is sufficient to curtail establishment, our work provides a mechanism for this seed limitation and suggests that, despite being a good competitor, N. pulchra cannot reestablish close to B. nigra within its old habitats because exotic-mediated consumption preempts direct competitive exclusion. Moreover, we find that apparent competition has a spatial extent, suggesting that consumers may dictate the rate of invasion and the area available for restoration, and that nonspatial studies of apparent competition may miss important dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18481540     DOI: 10.1890/07-0223.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  24 in total

1.  Exotic plant invasion in the context of plant defense against herbivores.

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Spatial interplay of plant competition and consumer foraging mediate plant coexistence and drive the invasion ratchet.

Authors:  John L Orrock; Marissa L Baskett; Robert D Holt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Seed bank survival of an invasive species, but not of two native species, declines with invasion.

Authors:  John L Orrock; Cory C Christopher; Humberto P Dutra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Sex and space destabilize intransitive competition within and between species.

Authors:  Mark Vellend; Isabelle Litrico
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Host-pathogen coevolution, secondary sympatry and species diversification.

Authors:  Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Granivory from native rodents and competition from an exotic invader strongly and equally limit the establishment of native grasses.

Authors:  Jacob E Lucero; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Niche opportunities for invasive annual plants in dryland ecosystems are controlled by disturbance, trophic interactions, and rainfall.

Authors:  Richard A Gill; Rory C O'Connor; Aaron Rhodes; Tara B B Bishop; Daniel C Laughlin; Samuel B St Clair
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Fire, rodent herbivory, and plant competition: implications for invasion and altered fire regimes in the Mojave Desert.

Authors:  Tara B B Bishop; Richard A Gill; Brock R McMillan; Samuel B St Clair
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Indirect effects of an invasive annual grass on seed fates of two native perennial grass species.

Authors:  Susan E Meyer; Katherine T Merrill; Phil S Allen; Julie Beckstead; Anna S Norte
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Indirect competition for pollinators is weak compared to direct resource competition: pollination and performance in the face of an invader.

Authors:  Jennifer D Palladini; John L Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.