Literature DB >> 18481187

Script concordance testing: more cases or more questions?

Robert Gagnon1, Bernard Charlin, Carole Lambert, Benoit Carrière, C Van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

Script concordance test (SCT) is a case based assessment format of clinical reasoning in which questions are nested into several cases. Recent results using Q4 format suggest that nested questions contribute more to reliability of measure than cases. The present study aims at documenting variance components associated with SCT cases and nested questions and to determine what are the optimal number and combinations of cases and nested questions. Data from SCT in three different fields are presented. G study and D study methodology are used to estimate variance component and to determine optimal number and combinations of cases and questions. Questions nested into cases contributed a large amount of score variance (more than 70%). D studies with varying samples show that, depending on the reliability of the test, an optimal number of 2-4 questions nested into 15-25 cases represents the best combination. Nested questions contribute to a significant portion of score variance, with the implication that formulation of up to 5 questions per case is an efficient way to optimize the reliability of SCT scores.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18481187     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-008-9120-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning in Psychiatry Using Clinical and Basic Science Concepts Presented in Session-level Integration Sessions.

Authors:  Dan I Blunk; Silvina Tonarelli; Claire Gardner; Dale Quest; Diana Petitt; Marie Leiner
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Design, implementation and evaluation of a training programme for school teachers in the use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests as part of a basic first aid kit in southern Malawi.

Authors:  Stefan Witek-McManus; Don P Mathanga; Allison Verney; Austin Mtali; Doreen Ali; John Sande; Reuben Mwenda; Saidi Ndau; Charles Mazinga; Emmanuel Phondiwa; Tiyese Chimuna; David Melody; Natalie Roschnik; Simon J Brooker; Katherine E Halliday
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Reliability and validity of the script concordance test for postgraduate students of general practice.

Authors:  Julie Subra; Bruno Chicoulaa; André Stillmunkès; Pierre Mesthé; Stéphane Oustric; Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Assessing clinical reasoning skills using Script Concordance Test (SCT) and extended matching questions (EMQs): A pilot for urology trainees.

Authors:  Syed Muhammad Nazim; Jamsheer J Talati; Sheila Pinjani; Syed Raziuddin Biyabani; Muhammad Hammad Ather; John J Norcini
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2019-01

5.  Examining response process validity of script concordance testing: a think-aloud approach.

Authors:  Michael Siu Hong Wan; Elina Tor; Judith N Hudson
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-24

6.  Script Concordance Tests for Formative Clinical Reasoning and Problem-Solving Assessment in General Pediatrics.

Authors:  Pranshu Bhardwaj; Erik W Black; Joseph C Fantone; Meghan Lopez; Maria Kelly
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Constructing a question bank based on script concordance approach as a novel assessment methodology in surgical education.

Authors:  Salah A Aldekhayel; Nahar A Alselaim; Mohi Eldin Magzoub; Mohammad M Al-Qattan; Abdullah M Al-Namlah; Hani Tamim; Abdullah Al-Khayal; Sultan I Al-Habdan; Mohammed F Zamakhshary
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction.

Authors:  Jean Paul Fournier; Anne Demeester; Bernard Charlin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Analysing clinical reasoning characteristics using a combined methods approach.

Authors:  Michele Groves; Marie-Louise Dick; Geoff McColl; Justin Bilszta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 10.  Evaluating the Clinical Reasoning of Student Health Professionals in Placement and Simulation Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jennie Brentnall; Debbie Thackray; Belinda Judd
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.