Literature DB >> 18480623

Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Walter Artibani1, Simonetta Fracalanza, Stefano Cavalleri, Massimo Iafrate, Maurizio Aragona, Giacomo Novara, Marina Gardiman, Vincenzo Ficarra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our initial experience in the treatment of prostate cancer with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), evaluating our results in terms of learning curve, postoperative outcomes and positive surgical margins.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2005 to February 2006, a single surgeon performed 41 RALP using the da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif., USA). Clinical and pathological data were collected prospectively and analyzed by a researcher from outside our clinic. The main perioperative parameters assessed were the following: operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate, intra- and postoperative complications, hospitalization time, catheterization time, and positive surgical margin rate. To evaluate the learning curve, patients were stratified into three groups: from case 1 to 10 (group 1), from case 11 to 20 (group 2), and from case 21 to 41 (group C).
RESULTS: Median operative time was 210 min. Mean blood loss was 400 ml, with 9.8% of the patients receiving blood transfusions. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 2 cases (4.9%), while 4 postoperative complications (9.7%) were reported. Median times of hospitalization and catheterization were 7 days. Positive surgical margins were detected in 26.8% of the cases (6.9% among pT2 patients). Operative time (p < 0.001), blood loss (p = 0.02), transfusion rate (p = 0.006), and postoperative complication rates (p = 0.03) reduced along the learning curve.
CONCLUSION: RALP is a feasible and reproducible technique, with a short learning curve and low perioperative complication rate. Even during the initial phase of the learning curve, good results were obtained with regard to postoperative complications and oncological outcome. 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18480623     DOI: 10.1159/000127333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  20 in total

1.  Does the presence of robotic surgery affect demographics in patients choosing to undergo radical prostatectomy? A multi-center contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Philippa J Cheetham; Daniel J Lee; Anna Rose-Morris; Simon F Brewster; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-10

2.  Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer.

Authors:  Jun Teishima; Minoru Hattori; Shogo Inoue; Kenichiro Ikeda; Keisuke Hieda; Shinya Ohara; Hiroyuki Egi; Hideki Ohdan; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The first year is the hardest: a comparison of early versus late experience after the introduction of robotic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Kimberly Washington; Jeffrey R Watkins; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-25

4.  Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert B Nadler; Jessica T Casey; Lee C Zhao; Neema Navai; Zachary L Smith; Ali Zhumkhawala; Amanda M Macejko
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-19

5.  From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R P Zweemer; W M van Baal; J van de Lande; J C Dijkstra; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-04-13

6.  Developing a robotic prostatectomy service and a robotic fellowship programme - defining the learning curve.

Authors:  Nikhil Vasdev; Conrad Bishop; Atoine Kass-Iliyya; Sami Hamid; Thomas A McNicholas; Venkat Prasad; Gowrie Mohan-S; Timothy Lane; Gregory Boustead; James M Adshead
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-02-10

7.  The role of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David S Kwon; George J Chang
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2011

8.  The future of spine surgery: New horizons in the treatment of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Noojan Kazemi; Laura K Crew; Trent L Tredway
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-19

Review 9.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  N L Sharma; N C Shah; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Ultrasound elastography as a tool for imaging guidance during prostatectomy: initial experience.

Authors:  Ioana Nicolaescu Fleming; Carmen Kut; Katarzyna J Macura; Li-Ming Su; Hassan Rivaz; Caitlin M Schneider; Ulrike Hamper; Tamara Lotan; Russ Taylor; Gregory Hager; Emad Boctor
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.