Literature DB >> 18480328

Systemic antibody response to Clostridium difficile in colonized patients with and without symptoms and matched controls.

Karla Sánchez-Hurtado1, Maria Corretge2, Esvet Mutlu1, Rowan McIlhagger2, John M Starr2, Ian R Poxton1.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that patients who develop Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) do so because they are unable to mount an adequate immune response. Serum was collected from three groups of elderly in-patients: (i) cases (n=21) of CDAD, being toxin A/B-positive; (ii) carriers (n=21) asymptomatic for CDAD (no diarrhoea) but at least toxin or culture positive; and (iii) controls (n=26) asymptomatic for CDAD and negative for both C. difficile toxin and culture. The age and gender of each group were compared, and the colonizing strains were ribotyped and toxinotyped. Serum antibodies (IgG and IgM) were measured by ELISA using different antigen preparations: EDTA extract (containing cell-surface proteins and carbohydrates), guanidine hydrochloride extract (surface-layer proteins), aqueous phenol-extracted lipocarbohydrate (LC); crude toxin (dialysis culture supernatant) and purified toxin A. LPS from Escherichia coli was used as a control antigen. Antibodies were also tested for toxin neutralization on tissue monolayers and for binding to EDTA-extracted antigens by Western blotting. IgG antibody measurements to cytomegalovirus (CMV) were included as an indicator of potential immunosenescence. Results showed that the patient groups were well matched by age and gender, and the colonizing strains were similar in cases and carriers, being predominantly ribotype 001 and toxinotype 0. By ELISA, IgG levels to most of the antigens were highest in the cases and lowest in the controls, with the exception of antibodies to the LC, which were higher in the controls than the cases. Levels in the carriers tended to be of intermediate level or similar to the controls. For all antigens, the levels of IgM were not significantly different among cases, carriers and controls. Serum from all groups was able to neutralize the cytotoxic action of toxin on both Vero and Caco2 cells, and all to a similar extent. Western blots showed an overall higher level of IgG antibodies to the EDTA-extracted antigens in the cases. The results of the CMV ELISA showed that specific IgG was detected in more cases (78%) than carriers and controls (both 65%), but this difference in seropositivity was not significant. The conclusion is that, during symptomatic infection, patients respond to protein antigens of C. difficile in a manner typical of a secondary antibody response, with no evidence that an inability to respond predisposes to the appearance of symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18480328     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47713-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  17 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and the use of fecal microbial transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  L Patrick Schenck; Paul L Beck; Justin A MacDonald
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Profiling Humoral Immune Responses to Clostridium difficile-Specific Antigens by Protein Microarray Analysis.

Authors:  Ola H Negm; Mohamed R Hamed; Elizabeth M Dilnot; Clifford C Shone; Izabela Marszalowska; Mark Lynch; Christine E Loscher; Laura J Edwards; Patrick J Tighe; Mark H Wilcox; Tanya M Monaghan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 3.  Novel therapies and preventative strategies for primary and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Michael G Dieterle; Krishna Rao; Vincent B Young
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Determination of serum antibodies to Clostridium difficile toxin B in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Faiz A Shakir; Tauseef Ali; Aletha C Bigham; Jimmy D Ballard; Philip B Miner; Jessica R Philpott
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-05

Review 5.  Control of Clostridium difficile Infection by Defined Microbial Communities.

Authors:  James Collins; Jennifer M Auchtung
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-09

6.  Clostridium difficile infection: An overview of the disease and its pathogenesis, epidemiology and interventions.

Authors:  V K Viswanathan; M J Mallozzi; Gayatri Vedantam
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 7.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile Infection in Children: Current State and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Thomas J Sandora
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 9.  The host immune response to Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Katie Solomon
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02

Review 10.  Immune responses to Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Rajat Madan; William A Petri
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 11.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.