Literature DB >> 18480325

Multicentre study of the prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Korea: results of a retrospective study 2000-2005.

Bo-Moon Shin1,2, Eun Young Kuak2, Hyeon Mi Yoo1, Eui Chong Kim3, Kyungwon Lee4, Jung-Oak Kang5, Dong Hee Whang6, Jeong-Hwan Shin7.   

Abstract

The prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Korea has been reported to be approximately 60-80%. Although the prevalence of the tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile strain was less then 5% prior to the year 2000, it has become an emerging nosocomial pathogen in Korea. Therefore, we have attempted to determine the multicentre nationwide prevalence of tcdA(+)tcdB(+) and tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile for epidemiological purposes. C. difficile strains (n=724, 30 from 2000, 80 from 2001, 74 from 2002, 76 from 2003, 179 from 2004, 285 from 2005) were obtained retrospectively from January 2000 to December 2005 from in-patients at 6 hospitals, all of whom were suspected of having C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD), colitis or pseudomembranous colitis. The numbers of participating hospitals varied yearly (1 in 2000, 2 in 2001-2003, 3 in 2004, 5 in 2005). The hospitals were located in Seoul (n=4), Kyunggi Province (n=1) and Busan (n=1), Korea. PCR assays for tcdA and tcdB genes were conducted using 724 unduplicated C. difficile isolates. The mean prevalence of tcdA(+)tcdB(+) and tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile strains over the 6 years was 51.8 % (38.4-59.3%) and 25.8%(10-56.0%), respectively. The mean prevalence of tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile strains was less than 7% until 2002, but began to increase in 2003 (13.2%) and achieved a peak in 2004 (50.3%). In 2005, the mean prevalence of tcdA(+)tcdB(+) and tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile strains was 47.7% (30.9-60.3%) and 27.0% (17.6-54.8%), respectively. This nationwide epidemiological study showed that tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile strains have already spread extensively throughout Korea, and our results provide basic data regarding the controversies currently surrounding the toxigenicity of tcdA(-)tcdB(+) C. difficile. The use of enzyme immunoassays capable of detecting both TcdA and TcdB is strongly recommended for the diagnosis of CDAD in microbiology laboratories, in order to control the spread of the tcdA(-)tcdB(+) strains of C. difficile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18480325     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47771-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  19 in total

1.  A human gut ecosystem protects against C. difficile disease by targeting TcdA.

Authors:  Sarah Lynn Martz; Mabel Guzman-Rodriguez; Shu-Mei He; Curtis Noordhof; David John Hurlbut; Gregory Brian Gloor; Christian Carlucci; Scott Weese; Emma Allen-Vercoe; Jun Sun; Erika Chiong Claud; Elaine Olga Petrof
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  J Freeman; M P Bauer; S D Baines; J Corver; W N Fawley; B Goorhuis; E J Kuijper; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Characterization of cases of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) presenting at an emergency room: molecular and clinical features differentiate community-onset hospital-associated and community-associated CDI in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Se Jin Moon; You Sun Kim; Won Chang Shin; Hyeon Mi Yoo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Fecal microbiota transplantation in relapsing Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Faith Rohlke; Neil Stollman
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.409

6.  Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Eun Young Kuak; Eun Joo Lee; J Glenn Songer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Clostridium difficile associated infection, diarrhea and colitis.

Authors:  Perry Hookman; Jamie S Barkin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Shin; Esteban Chaves-Olarte; Cirle A Warren
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2016-06

9.  Incidence and clinical features of Clostridium difficile infection in Korea: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Y S Kim; D S Han; Y H Kim; W H Kim; J S Kim; H S Kim; H S Kim; Y S Park; H J Song; S J Shin; S K Yang; B D Ye; C S Eun; K M Lee; S H Lee; B I Jang; S A Jung; J H Cheon; C H Choi; K C Huh
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in a Korean tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Jieun Kim; Hyunjoo Pai; Mi-ran Seo; Jung Oak Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.