Literature DB >> 18480145

Concept of REACH and impact on evaluation of chemicals.

H Foth1, Aw Hayes.   

Abstract

Industrial chemicals have been in use for many decades and new products are regularly invented and introduced to the market. Also for decades, many different chemical laws have been introduced to regulate safe handling of chemicals in different use patterns. The patchwork of current regulation in the European Union is to be replaced by the new regulation on industrial chemical control, REACH. REACH stands for registration, evaluation, and authorization of chemicals. REACH entered force on June 1, 2007. REACH aims to overcome limitations in testing requirements of former regulation on industrial chemicals to enhance competitiveness and innovation with regard to manufacture safer substances and to promote the development of alternative testing methods. A main task of REACH is to address data gaps regarding the properties and uses of industrial chemicals. Producers, importers, and downstream users will have to compile and communicate standard information for all chemicals. Information sets to be prepared include safety data sheets (SDS), chemical safety reports (CSR), and chemical safety assessments (CSA). These are designed to guarantee adequate handling in the production chain, in transport and in use and to prevent the substances from being released to and distributed within the environment. Another important aim is to identify the most harmful chemicals and to set incentives to substitute them with safer alternatives. On one hand, REACH will have substantial impact on the basic understanding of the evaluation of chemicals. However, the toxicological sciences can also substantially influence the workability of REACH that supports the transformation of data to the information required to understand and manage acceptable and non acceptable risks in the use of industrial chemicals. The REACH regulation has been laid down in the main document and 17 Annexes of more than 849 pages. Even bigger technical guidance documents will follow and will inform about the rules for application and work out of dossiers. The following article gives a comprehensive overview on the concept of REACH to give deeper insight into this document. Members of the scientific community will have to define their own position as researchers, teachers, and experts to support the efforts to protect human health and the environment. The concept of REACH as well as new approaches to adapt standard testing regimes to foster a risk oriented approach in required work load to decrease animal based tests and to strengthen weight of evidence are explained in detail in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18480145     DOI: 10.1177/0960327107087801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol        ISSN: 0960-3271            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; Barbara A Wetmore; David J Dix; Stephen S Ferguson; Harvey J Clewell; Keith A Houck; Edward L Lecluyse; Melvin E Andersen; Richard S Judson; Cornelia M Smith; Mark A Sochaski; Robert J Kavlock; Frank Boellmann; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; John F Wambaugh; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Finfish and aquatic invertebrate pathology resources for now and the future.

Authors:  Jan M Spitsbergen; Vicki S Blazer; Paul R Bowser; Keith C Cheng; Keith R Cooper; Timothy K Cooper; Salvatore Frasca; David B Groman; Claudia M Harper; Jerry M Mac Law; Gary D Marty; Roxanna M Smolowitz; Judy St Leger; Douglas C Wolf; Jeffrey C Wolf
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.228

3.  Advancing Exposure Science through Chemical Data Curation and Integration in the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.

Authors:  Cynthia J Grondin; Allan Peter Davis; Thomas C Wiegers; Benjamin L King; Jolene A Wiegers; David M Reif; Jane A Hoppin; Carolyn J Mattingly
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Producers of Engineered Nanomaterials-What Motivates Company and Worker Participation in Biomonitoring Programs?

Authors:  Camille Crézé; Marjorie François; Nancy B Hopf; Victor Dorribo; Jean-Jacques Sauvain; Enrico Bergamaschi; Giacomo Garzaro; Maida Domat; Judith Friesl; Eva Penssler; Athena Progiou; Irina Guseva Canu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  High-Throughput Omics Technologies: Potential Tools for the Investigation of Influences of EMF on Biological Systems.

Authors:  M Blankenburg; L Haberland; H-D Elvers; C Tannert; B Jandrig
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.