Literature DB >> 18479484

Estimating abundance using mark-resight when sampling is with replacement or the number of marked individuals is unknown.

Brett T McClintock1, Gary C White, Michael F Antolin, Daniel W Tripp.   

Abstract

Although mark-resight methods can often be a less expensive and less invasive means for estimating abundance in long-term population monitoring programs, two major limitations of the estimators are that they typically require sampling without replacement and/or the number of marked individuals available for resighting to be known exactly. These requirements can often be difficult to achieve. Here we address these limitations by introducing the Poisson log and zero-truncated Poisson log-normal mixed effects models (PNE and ZPNE, respectively). The generalized framework of the models allow the efficient use of covariates in modeling resighting rate and individual heterogeneity parameters, information-theoretic model selection and multimodel inference, and the incorporation of individually unidentified marks. Both models may be implemented using standard statistical computing software, but they have also been added to the mark-recapture freeware package Program MARK. We demonstrate the use and advantages of (Z)PNE using black-tailed prairie dog data recently collected in Colorado. We also investigate the expected relative performance of the models in simulation experiments. Compared to other available estimators, we generally found (Z)PNE to be more precise with little or no loss in confidence interval coverage. With the recent introduction of the logit-normal mixed effects model and (Z)PNE, a more flexible and efficient framework for mark-resight abundance estimation is now available for the sampling conditions most commonly encountered in these studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18479484     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01047.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Lions and prions and deer demise.

Authors:  Michael W Miller; Heather M Swanson; Lisa L Wolfe; Fred G Quartarone; Sherri L Huwer; Charles H Southwick; Paul M Lukacs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study.

Authors:  Robert S Alonso; Brett T McClintock; Lisa M Lyren; Erin E Boydston; Kevin R Crooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Use of RFID technology to characterize feeder visitations and contact network of hummingbirds in urban habitats.

Authors:  Ruta R Bandivadekar; Pranav S Pandit; Rahel Sollmann; Michael J Thomas; Scott M Logan; Jennifer C Brown; A Peter Klimley; Lisa A Tell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods.

Authors:  Emma L Carroll; Mike W Bruford; J Andrew DeWoody; Gregoire Leroy; Alan Strand; Lisette Waits; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Flocking propensity by satellites, but not core members of mixed-species flocks, increases when individuals experience energetic deficits in a poor-quality foraging habitat.

Authors:  Katherine E Gentry; Daniel P Roche; Stephen G Mugel; Nolan D Lancaster; Kathryn E Sieving; Todd M Freeberg; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A hierarchical modeling framework for multiple observer transect surveys.

Authors:  Paul B Conn; Jeffrey L Laake; Devin S Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Summer watering patterns of mule deer in the Great Basin Desert, USA: implications of differential use by individuals and the sexes for management of water resources.

Authors:  Andrew V Shields; Randy T Larsen; Jericho C Whiting
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-10-17

8.  Observations on abundance of bluntnose sixgill sharks, Hexanchus griseus, in an urban waterway in Puget Sound, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Denise Griffing; Shawn Larson; Joel Hollander; Tim Carpenter; Jeff Christiansen; Charles Doss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Band reporting rates of waterfowl: does individual heterogeneity bias estimated survival rates?

Authors:  Gary C White; Line S Cordes; Todd W Arnold
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Comparison of Drive Counts and Mark-Resight As Methods of Population Size Estimation of Highly Dense Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) Populations.

Authors:  Kazutaka Takeshita; Takashi Ikeda; Hiroshi Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Yoshida; Hiromasa Igota; Yukiko Matsuura; Koichi Kaji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.